 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
The three most interesting versions of the Oncore are the "VP",
the "UT+",
and the "Remote" which is a prepackaged "UT+".
The "VP" is no longer available.
The evaluation kit
can also be recommended, it interfaces to a PC straightaway, using the
serial (DCD) or parallel port for PPS input and packs the
receiver in a nice and sturdy box.
Two less expensive interface kits are available from
TAPR .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The driver requires a standard PPS interface for the pulse-per-second output from the receiver. The serial data stream alone does not provide precision time stamps (0-50msec variance, according to the manual), whereas the PPS output is precise down to 50 nsec (1 sigma) for the VP/UT models.
The driver will use the "position hold" mode with user provided coordinates, the receivers built-in site-survey, or a similar algorithm implemented in this driver to determine the antenna position.
In addition, on platforms supporting Shared Memory, all of the messages received from the Oncore receiver are made available in shared memory for use by other programs. See the Oncore-SHMEM manual page for information on how to use this option. For either debugging or using the SHMEM option, an Oncore Reference Manual for the specific receiver in use will be required.
The driver was initially developed on FreeBSD, and has since been tested on Linux, SunOS and Solaris.
There is a driver specific configuration file /etc/ntp.oncore that contains information on the startup mode, the location of the GPS receiver, an offset of the PPS signal from zero, and the cable delay. The offset shifts the PPS signal to avoid interrupt pileups `on' the second, and adjust the timestamp accordingly. See the driver source for information on this file. The default with no file is: no delay, no offset, and a site survey is done to get the location of the gps receiver.
The /etc/ntp.conf file will need a line of the form
pps /dev/oncore.pps.0 [ assert/clear ] hardpps
if you want the oncore driver to control the kernel PLL.
For more information, see the Reference Clock
Options page.
Performance
Really good. With the VP/UT+, the generated PPS pulse is referenced to UTC(GPS) with better than 50 nsec (1 sigma) accuracy. The limiting factor will be the timebase of the computer and the precision with which you can timestamp the rising flank of the PPS signal. Using FreeBSD, a FPGA based Timecounter/PPS interface and an ovenized quartz oscillator, that performance has been reproduced. For more details on this aspect: Sub-Microsecond timekeeping under FreeBSD