setting \n as the record delimited using a numeric value rather than literal
\n - and to not incorrectly turn \n into a field separator if -R is used to
make some other char the record separator (\n becomes a field separator in
that case as long as the field separator remains "white space" but should not
be in any other case - unless set explicitly of course.)
Plus more cosmetic changes - the man page and usage are updated to make it
more clear that the 2 (or 1) params to -k are not fields (field1 and field2)
but specifiers of the beginning and end of one key field. There was an
unused 'x' option in the GETOPTS string. The usage message is reformatted
to display properly on both 80 col and > 80 col displays (on < 80 it will
still probably look pretty ugly ... perhaps not quite so bad though), and
is also updated to show the different usage for the -c case (and -C) from the
others (only 1 file permitted) - the man page synopsis has a similar update.
Using more than one of -c -C or -m generates a usage message rather than
just ignoring the -m as it did before (there was no -C before of course).
Aside from the bug fix to the interaction between -R and -t, there are no
changes that affect the way anything is sorted (or read, or written).
Discussed on tech-userlevel earlier this week.
This prevents converting "+3" into "-k4.1" in places where getopt
won't recognize it, which in turn prevents silly error messages and
lossage trying to sort files whose names begin with +. PR 43358.
Reduces the amount of data written to temporary files.
The 3-level stack has to do a simple reduce after 4352 input files, for
a normal file sort this is 35GB of data or about 500 million records.
This needs about 50 open fd's - which should be ok.
Clearly the merge sort could process more input files in one go - speeding
up the sort, but at some point the number of input files would exceed
whatever limit was applied.
Split the merge sort so that fsort() can pass the 'FILE *' of the temporary
files to be merged into the merge code.
Don't rely on realloc() not moving the end address of a buffer!
Rework merge sort so that it sorts pointers to 'struct mfile' and only
copies about sort record descriptors.
No functional change intended.
This frees a byte value to use for 'end of key' (to correctly sort
short keys) while still having a weight assigned to the field sep.
(Unless -t is given, the field sep is in the field data.)
Do reverse sorts by writing the output file in reverse order (rather
than reversing the sort - apart from merges).
All key compares are now unweighted.
For 'sort -u' mark duplicates keys during the sort and don't write
to the output.
Use -S to mean a posix sort - where equal keys are sorted using the
raw record (rather than being kept in the original order).
For 'sort -f' (no keys) generate a key of the folded data (as for -n
-i and -d), simplifies the code and allows a 'posix' sort.
an array of 'RECHEADER *' and remove all the crappy stuff that backed up
by REC_DATA_OFFSET (etc).
Also change radix_sort() to return the number of elements, soon to be used
to drop duplicate keys (for sort -u).
Currently unchanged apart from the deletion of the 'unstable' version and
other unneeded code.
Use fldtab[0]. not fldtab-> when we are referring to the global info
in the 0th entry to emphasise that this entry is different.
fldtab[0].weights is only needed in the SINGL_FLD case - so set it there.
Re-indent a big 'if' is setfield() so that the line breaks match the
logic - which looks dubious now!
Note that -H is now ignored.
Move -S and -s (and -H) to the first list of options since they are
global ones, not ones that override the ordering rules.
as if part of the data.
This is a bit fubar since we need a value than sorts before any byte value
as a key field separator - so need 257 byte values (since radixsort() doesn't
take a length for each record).
For now map '\t' to 0x01 and hope no one will notice!
- If we generate a key, it is always sortable using memcmp()
- If we are sorting the whole record, then a weight-table must be used
during compares.
- Major surgery to encoding of numbers to ensure unique keys for equal
numeric values. Reverse numerics are handled by inverting the sign.
- Case folding (-f) is handled when the sort keys are generated. No other
code has to care at all.
- Key uniqueness (-u) is done during merge for large datasets. It only
has to be done when writing the output file for small files.
Since the file is in key order this is simple!
Probably fixes all of: PR/27257 PR/25551 PR/22182 PR/31095 PR/30504
PR/36816 PR/37860 PR/39308
Also PR/18614 should no longer die, but a little more work needs to be
done on the merging for very large files.
Simplify logic for reading input records.
Do a merge sort whenever we have 16 partial sorted blocks.
The patient is breathing, but still carrying a lot of extra weight.
first key byte and writing to a temp file, then sorting the records from
each temp file that had the same first key byte (and repeating for upto
4 key bytes) was a nice idea, but completely doomed to failure.
Eg PR/9308 where a 70MB file has all but one record the same and short keys.
Not only does the code not work, it is rather guaranteed to be slow.
Instead always use a merge sort for fully sorted chunk of records (each
temporary file contains one lot of sorted records).
The -H option already did this, so just rip out all the code and variables
that can't be used when -H was specified.
Further cleanup to come ...
reference, when we want to find the record header put the larger value
into 'hdr_off' to avoid any confusion that the code might be changing
'depth'!
There is now no need to save the original value as 'odepth' in append.c.
All an a vague attempt to make this code slightly readable.
almost always need one.
But do ADD it, instead of overwriting the last byte of the last key since
that may be requesting the other end of the sort order.
There is no need to check for space for the line after adding the key,
but we might as well check before - just to optimise that case.
This might fix some of the sort bugs - but not the one I'm looking at!
structure that used it.
Pass end of keybuf area, not size to enterkey() - largely to remove a
variable who'se use isn't obvious from the name!
The structute of this code sucks.
christos