* dopowerhooks(PWR_SOFTSTANDBY) in apm_standby().
* dopowerhooks(PWR_SOFTRESUME) in apm_resume().
* dopowerhooks(PWR_RESUME), dopowerhooks(PWR_STANDBY),
dopowerhooks(PWR_SUSPEND) run in splhigh() state.
These changes sync with arch/i386/i386/apm.c.
- let ipfilter look at wire-format packet only (not the decapsulated ones),
so that VPN setting can work with NAT/ipfilter settings.
sync with kame.
TODO: use header history for stricter inbound validation
networking utilities without ipsec support.
If people clamor for a change in this (for example, to allow IPSec tools to
be updated separately), this can be changed, but it does not appear useful.
Also, most device functions related to IRQ handling no longer take a device
pointer. We make so many assumptions about the machine's layout in irq.c that
this just seemed silly.
This is the original New AWK from AT&T Labs as described in "The
AWK Programming Language", by Al Aho, Brian Kernighan, and Peter
Weinberger.
This would eventually replace gawk in our tree in future.
The architecture here follows that of the vax port -- each device has its
evcnt in its softc, but defers actually incrementing it to the IRQ
dispatcher. This way, devices can attach sub-counts (e.g. Rx and Tx counts
for Ethernet interfaces), but don't all have to have code to increment the
counters.
Drivers deliberately call evcnt_attach_dynamic() before establishing their
interrupt handler so that the establish routine can attach a parent event if
that's appropriate. At present, it isn't.
The architecture here follows that of the vax port -- each device has its
evcnt in its softc, but defers actually incrementing it to the IRQ
dispatcher. This way, devices can attach sub-counts (e.g. Rx and Tx counts
for Ethernet interfaces), but don't all have to have code to increment the
counters.
Drivers deliberately call evcnt_attach_dynamic() before establishing their
interrupt handler so that the establish routine can attach a parent event if
that's appropriate. At present, it isn't.
This is not unprecedented, as we do it in >100 places in the tree.
If you disagree with this philosophy, take it to tech-kern for a discussion
FIRST before reverting; TNF, not one particular person, owns this file.
