Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
lukem 64a432d965 remove unnecessary #if NFOO > 0 .... #endif wrappers 2001-11-13 00:49:35 +00:00
lukem 34d65a3414 add RCSIDs 2001-11-12 23:49:33 +00:00
martin d1f0e4f6e4 Don't call if_alloc_sadl when creating the pppoe interface, it's called
from sppp_attach.
When destroying the interface, call sppp_detach for proper cleanup.
This avoids a crash from the slow timeout handler for no longer existing
interfaces (spotted by Rémi Zara).
2001-10-28 09:48:20 +00:00
martin 308d03266a Make this interface cloning. 2001-09-04 20:41:32 +00:00
martin 74f0920eda Take into account the two byte PPP protocol discrimator following the PPPoE
header when calculating the MTU. Ooops...

Thanks to Mario Kemper for noting this.
2001-06-24 20:35:50 +00:00
martin 91a63a0595 Protect interface queue manipulations by splnet(). Splsoftnet() is not
enough.
2001-06-18 12:32:47 +00:00
itojun 4d51fe368b change the meaning of ifnet.if_lastchange to meet RFC1573 ifLastChange.
follows BSD/OS practice and ucd-snmp code (FreeBSD does it for specific
interfaces only).

was: if_lastchange get updated on every packet transmission/receipt.
now: if_lastchange get updated when IFF_UP is changed.
2001-06-14 05:44:23 +00:00
martin b5b75a7d19 Add an in-kernel PPPoE (ppp over ethernet, RFC 2516) implementation,
based on the existing net/if_spppsubr.c stuff.

While there are completely userland (bpf based) implementations available,
those have a vastly larger per packet overhead thus causing major CPU
overhead and higher latency. On an i386 base router, running a 486DX at 50MHz
my line (768kBit/s downstream) was limited to something (varying) between 10
and 20 kByte/s effective download rate. With this implementation I get full
bandwidth (~85kByte/s).

This is client side only. Arguably the right way to add full PPPoE support
(including server side) would be a variation of the ppp line discipline and
appropriate modifications to pppd. I promise every help I can give to anyone
doing that - but I needed this realy fast. Besids, on low memory NAT boxes
with typically a single PPPoE connection, this implementation is more
lightweight than a pppd based one, which nicely fits my needs.
2001-04-29 09:50:36 +00:00