Rename compiler-warning-disable variables from
GCC_NO_warning
to
CC_WNO_warning
where warning is the full warning name as used by the compiler.
GCC_NO_IMPLICIT_FALLTHRU is CC_WNO_IMPLICIT_FALLTHROUGH
Using the convention CC_compilerflag, where compilerflag
is based on the full compiler flag name.
Provide a single variable
CC_WNO_ADDRESS_OF_PACKED_MEMBER
with options for both clang and gcc, to replace
CLANG_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER
CC_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER
GCC_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER
Using the convention CC_compilerflag, where compilerflag
is based on the full compiler flag name.
represented by the Rock Ridge extensions would actually differ. We would
omit the record for an all-upper-case directory name, however Linux (and
perhaps other operating systems) map names with no NM record to
lowercase.
This affected only directories, as file names have an implicit ";1"
version number appended and thus always differ. To solve, just emit NM
records for all entries other than DOT and DOTDOT .
We could continue to omit the NM record for directories that would avoid
mapping (for example, one named 1234.567) but this does not seem worth
the complexity.
From FreeBSD https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39258
incorrect, and timestamps were written in the wrong order.
See RRIP 4.1.6 Description of the "TF" System Use Entry for details.
From: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39221
being used after a (possible) call to printf (only happens when
debugging) and a certain call to free() (via brelse()).
Make a copy, and use that instead.
Apply these commits from FreeBSD:
commit e870d1e6f97cc73308c11c40684b775bcfa906a2
Author: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed Feb 10 20:10:35 2010 +0000
This fix corrects a problem in the file system that treats large
inode numbers as negative rather than unsigned. For a default
(16K block) file system, this bug began to show up at a file system
size above about 16Tb.
To fully handle this problem, newfs must be updated to ensure that
it will never create a filesystem with more than 2^32 inodes. That
patch will be forthcoming soon.
Reported by: Scott Burns, John Kilburg, Bruce Evans
Followup by: Jeff Roberson
PR: 133980
MFC after: 2 weeks
commit 81479e688b0f643ffacd3f335b4b4bba460b769d
Author: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu Feb 11 18:14:53 2010 +0000
One last pass to get all the unsigned comparisons correct.
In additional to the changes from FreeBSD, this commit includes quite a few
related changes to appease -Wsign-compare.
disabling support in UFS2 for extended attributes (including ACLs).
Add a new variant of UFS2 called "UFS2ea" that does support extended attributes.
Add new fsck_ffs operations "-c ea" and "-c no-ea" to convert file systems
from UFS2 to UFS2ea and vice-versa (both of which delete all existing extended
attributes in the process).
While here, use the computated obj_size even though it's always the same as
its information length since we don't use extended attribute files or
stream directories.
section for fsck_udf(8).
Newfs_udf and makefs support predefined disc image profiles, harddisc
partitions (disklabel and wedges on all generic block devices) and all optical
media types on CD/DVD/BD writers.
Newfs_udf and makefs now also support formatting of UDF 2.50 with a metadata
partition.
not a zero terminated string cn_nameptr.
Change the following operations to work with counted strings:
v7fs_file_lookup_by_name()
v7fs_file_allocate()
v7fs_file_deallocate()
v7fs_directory_add_entry()
v7fs_directory_remove_entry()
v7fs_file_rename()
v7fs_file_link()
v7fs_dirent_filename()
Adapt all vnode operations with component names as argument.
right now. new address-of-packed-member and format-overflow
warnings have new GCC_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER amd
GCC_NO_FORMAT_OVERFLOW variables to remove these warnings.
apply to a bunch of the tree. mostly, these are real bugs that
should be fixed, but in many cases, only by removing the 'packed'
attribute from some structure that doesn't really need it. (i
looked at many different ones, and while perhaps 60-80% were
already properly aligned, it wasn't clear to me that the uses
were always coming from sane data vs network alignment, so it
doesn't seem safe to remove packed without careful research for
each affect struct.) clang already warned (and was not erroring)
for many of these cases, but gcc picked up dozens more.
stored internal or not. Also make a note that the datablocks predictor takes
NO extended attributes stored in the node into account
In rare cases it could lead to confusion where the predictor would say it
wouldn't fit internally when it could just have fitted. This would trigger the
assertion. Now it will on rare accasions create a datablock even though it
might have fitted.
GCC_NO_FORMAT_TRUNCATION -Wno-format-truncation (GCC 7/8)
GCC_NO_STRINGOP_TRUNCATION -Wno-stringop-truncation (GCC 8)
GCC_NO_STRINGOP_OVERFLOW -Wno-stringop-overflow (GCC 8)
GCC_NO_CAST_FUNCTION_TYPE -Wno-cast-function-type (GCC 8)
use these to turn off warnings for most GCC-8 complaints. many
of these are false positives, most of the real bugs are already
commited, or are yet to come.
we plan to introduce versions of (some?) of these that use the
"-Wno-error=" form, which still displays the warnings but does
not make it an error, and all of the above will be re-considered
as either being "fix me" (warning still displayed) or "warning
is wrong."
These functions are defined on unsigned int. The generic name
min/max should not silently truncate to 32 bits on 64-bit systems.
This is purely a name change -- no functional change intended.
HOWEVER! Some subsystems have
#define min(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
#define max(a, b) ((a) > (b) ? (a) : (b))
even though our standard name for that is MIN/MAX. Although these
may invite multiple evaluation bugs, these do _not_ cause integer
truncation.
To avoid `fixing' these cases, I first changed the name in libkern,
and then compile-tested every file where min/max occurred in order to
confirm that it failed -- and thus confirm that nothing shadowed
min/max -- before changing it.
I have left a handful of bootloaders that are too annoying to
compile-test, and some dead code:
cobalt ews4800mips hp300 hppa ia64 luna68k vax
acorn32/if_ie.c (not included in any kernels)
macppc/if_gm.c (superseded by gem(4))
It should be easy to fix the fallout once identified -- this way of
doing things fails safe, and the goal here, after all, is to _avoid_
silent integer truncations, not introduce them.
Maybe one day we can reintroduce min/max as type-generic things that
never silently truncate. But we should avoid doing that for a while,
so that existing code has a chance to be detected by the compiler for
conversion to uimin/uimax without changing the semantics until we can
properly audit it all. (Who knows, maybe in some cases integer
truncation is actually intended!)
lukem