in private mail, it broke rcp(1).
To achieve the documented behavior and to fix long standing incorrect
rsh(1) behavior which I've tried to fix in rev. 1.36, rcmd(1) should have
two operation mode; whether it should relay signal information on
auxiliary channel or not, depending on the argument `fd2p' passed to rcmd(3).
So, make rcmd(1) behave differntly depending on the environment variable and
set it when necessary in rcmd(3) according to how auxiliary channel
is set up by rcmd(3).
is delivered to the remote process via the secondary channel. So,
the backend driver, rcmd(1), is responsible to watch the file descriptor 2
and transfer the data to the remote process, rather than receiving signal
by itself. Previously, signal generated by tty was sent since rcmd was
incorrectly generated the data, but, for example, signal sent to rsh command
by kill command was ignored.
FORTIFY_SOURCE feature of libssp, thus checking the size of arguments to
various string and memory copy and set functions (as well as a few system
calls and other miscellany) where known at function entry. RedHat has
evidently built all "core system packages" with this option for some time.
This option should be used at the top of Makefiles (or Makefile.inc where
this is used for subdirectories) but after any setting of LIB.
This is only useful for userland code, and cannot be used in libc or in
any code which includes the libc internals, because it overrides certain
libc functions with macros. Some effort has been made to make USE_FORT=yes
work correctly for a full-system build by having the bsd.sys.mk logic
disable the feature where it should not be used (libc, libssp iteself,
the kernel) but no attempt has been made to build the entire system with
USE_FORT and doing so will doubtless expose numerous bugs and misfeatures.
Adjust the system build so that all programs and libraries that are setuid,
directly handle network data (including serial comm data), perform
authentication, or appear likely to have (or have a history of having)
data-driven bugs (e.g. file(1)) are built with USE_FORT=yes by default,
with the exception of libc, which cannot use USE_FORT and thus uses
only USE_SSP by default. Tested on i386 with no ill results; USE_FORT=no
per-directory or in a system build will disable if desired.
XXX this doesn't help with rsh insisting on a reserved port, which of course
fails for non root users. and which only seems to happen when given
ports >1023, funny enough. anyone? :/
- rsh/rcmd combinations don't die sometimes, and spin in poll loops
+ detect errors from read/write etc, don't ignore them in some cases
+ use INFTIM instead of 0 in poll
+ detect invalid file descriptors in poll
+ use varargs/stdarg as appropriate
+ use posix signal calls
+ EWOULDBLOCK -> EAGAIN
wiz