tmpfs' "API" and was already rotting.
Instead, merge all the relevant comments into the code. This includes
acknowledgements to Google's Summer of Code 2005 program (they were in the
AUTHORS section of tmpfs(9) before), so all the files need to be changed
to include this sentence alongside the title. (Note that this was not a
requirement of the program.)
was developed as part of Google's Summer of Code 2005 program. This
change adds the kernel code, the mount_tmpfs utility, a regression test
suite and does all other related changes to integrate these.
The file-system is still *experimental*. Therefore, it is disabled by
default in all kernels. However, as typically done, a commented-out
entry is added in them to ease its setup.
Note that I haven't commited the required mountd(8) changes to be able
to export tmpfs file-systems because NFS support is still very unstable
and because, before enabling it, I'd like to do some other changes.
OK'ed by my project mentor, William Studenmund (wrstuden@).
* Extend the lfs library from fsck_lfs(8) so that it can be used with a
not-yet-existent LFS. Make newfs_lfs(8) use this library, so it can
create LFSs whose Ifile is larger than one segment.
* Make newfs_lfs(8) use strsuftoi64() for its arguments, a la newfs(8).
* Make fsck_lfs(8) respect the "file system is clean" flag.
* Don't let fsck_lfs(8) think it has dirty blocks when invoked with the
-n flag.
what makes up a good filesystem; and that (2) the kernel and fsck_lfs
also agree. This test, like the 9994 test and like the FFS endianness
test, is not included in the main "make regress".
- list NOxxx and LDSTATIC= assignments before everything else
(especially <bsd.own.mk>)
- ensure <bsd.own.mk> is included before NETBSDSRCDIR is used
- add missing RCSids
IWAMOTO Toshihiro's test program submitted with PR #9994, modified to
perform the same operations on a control file, presumably held in a
known-working filesystem. Test and control files are compared with "diff"
after the run (assuming that the kernel does not panic, which is really
the main point of the test).
Not included in the parent Makefile's list, as it requires the existence of
an LFS of some size.
