c14f2d4ef8
Deal with optional HAVE_GCC.
2012-08-10 16:05:26 +00:00
c23dc553e9
obsolete now useless (and wrongly set to "219" :-) HAVE_BINUTILS.
...
switch the sense of the gdb and gcc tests to list the platforms not
switched to gcc 4.5 or gdb 7, which is now:
GCC 4.1:
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "alpha" || \
${MACHINE_CPU} == "arm" || \
${MACHINE_CPU} == "m68k" || \
${MACHINE_CPU} == "vax"
GDB 6:
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "alpha" || \
${MACHINE_ARCH} == "hppa" || \
${MACHINE_CPU} == "mips" || \
${MACHINE_CPU} == "sh3" || \
${MACHINE_ARCH} == "vax"
let's go, people! (-:
2011-10-31 08:14:43 +00:00
4ad34de5ac
Descent into gdb if we support it yet.
2011-10-08 21:52:15 +00:00
f7fea21d51
re-enable the gcc 4.5 crtstuff/libgcc builders now that they work.
...
also build the gmp, mpfr and mpc libraries in this case.
2011-06-29 02:05:24 +00:00
8dbf0d5bb3
prepare to build native gcc 4.5, don't build native gcc 4.1, for HAVE_GCC=45
2011-06-21 04:52:49 +00:00
8a770313a3
Rename MKBFD to MKBINUTILS and support HAVE_BINUTILS for set lists. This
...
makes {MK,HAVE_}BINUTILS consistent with {MK,HAVE_}{GCC,GDB}.
Allow MKBFD to defines MKBINUTILS as a backwards compatibility hook.
Update the sets lists and add conditionals for lib{bfd,opcodes}.
2009-09-08 07:08:00 +00:00
859ec79e00
Build binutils if ${MKBFD} != "no" && ${HAVE_BINUTILS} == "219"
2009-08-21 06:54:01 +00:00
joerg