Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
martin
e2eacae3cf Assume that the NAT failures that happen on some architectures are endianess
bugs, so do not expect failure on LE archs for now.
2013-05-16 07:20:29 +00:00
pgoyette
5cf1898f6e Use proper quoting for the expected-failure reason 2012-12-01 04:43:44 +00:00
pgoyette
a95855641b If we're going to expect a failure, we need to use the correct shell
function!  "atf_expect_fail()" does not have a "_tc" in its name!
2012-11-30 14:46:48 +00:00
pgoyette
85d282e793 fix typo in previous - missing quote 2012-11-29 18:54:43 +00:00
pgoyette
a557d345a2 Add another test option for expected failures, rather than simply
skipping tests
2012-11-29 17:10:21 +00:00
jmmv
decf2b5e0f Adjusts tests after import of atf-0.12:
- The use.fs property is gone.
- Mark the tests/fs/t_create:attrs test as broken when using the default
  unprivileged-user:_atf setting.  This probably deserves a fix somehow
  but I'm not sure at this point.
2010-11-07 17:51:16 +00:00
jmmv
b27e7b1e81 Oh, wow. Loads of broken ipf test cases that went unnoticed because they
were unchecked errors.  Fix them.

These have been caught by the upcoming version of atf, which explicitly
does 'set -e' in shell test programs.
2010-10-19 16:36:36 +00:00
jmmv
f8a35c46be Do not use awk to generate the test program. Use some eval magic to generate
the tests on the fly alongside with easier-to-read functions.

While doing this, split the big monolithic test program into more granular
but cohesive test programs.

Phew, this one was tough.  And it's horrible to see that many these tests
(yes, the tests themselves probably) are broken.
2010-07-10 17:28:36 +00:00