IPv6 is supported by filters (":ignore ssh") as well.
TODO: do something about line truncation?
TODO: inet6.icmp6? ":help" will not fit into single line...
.Sh SEE ALSO
rather than:
.Sh "SEE ALSO"
The former is the correct form, and it makes a (barely persceptible)
difference in formatting for some output devices (e.g. 'ps').
password map was split and master.passwd.byname was introduced.
XXX This is a temporary fix until luke finds some time to add
the necessary support glue to libc for TRT.
bottom is reached, clear the remaining lines, lest there be stale process
entries if the process list shrinks.
* Implement a top(1)-like `user' command in the ps display.
that `systat doesn't handle errors'. Second off, errx should not be used directly, since
the terminal should be cleaned up before bailing. Third off, whatever we do we need
to be consistent.
There, I feel better now.
1.) fix a bug which caused coredumps when starting with no mode arguments
2.) move to table-lookup for mode-specific command parsing as well.
all command matching is now table-driven.
int overflow. It's now possible to add/display quotas of more than
4G.
XXX I'm sure there is a PR open on this but I couln't find it with the
usual search engines. If someone knows it's number ...
Vastly simplify handling of mode switches, and short-syntax interval
changes. Substring matching of mode names and commands will come
shortly, however the previous method of substring matching modes (it was
not available for commands) is currently not working.
TODO: implement table lookups for mode-specific commands.
table lookup. This will make prefix matching and so on easier.
Expect a similar change for mode-specific commands before too long.
While there, rename some structures with misleading names.
Watch this space for more changes soon.
long struct name.
XXX There are a lot of static arrays in there, bounds should be checked
XXX more carrefuly. All of them seems big enouth (>100) for normal use, though.
setuid telnet(1).
i'm not sure why it is here (maybe someone reused this code from
other setuid'ed program, or someone cut-and-pasted the code from
somewhere else?), it was from revision 1.1 (= 4.4BSD).
briefly discussed in: tech-net?
itojun