GCC_NO_FORMAT_TRUNCATION -Wno-format-truncation (GCC 7/8)
GCC_NO_STRINGOP_TRUNCATION -Wno-stringop-truncation (GCC 8)
GCC_NO_STRINGOP_OVERFLOW -Wno-stringop-overflow (GCC 8)
GCC_NO_CAST_FUNCTION_TYPE -Wno-cast-function-type (GCC 8)
use these to turn off warnings for most GCC-8 complaints. many
of these are false positives, most of the real bugs are already
commited, or are yet to come.
we plan to introduce versions of (some?) of these that use the
"-Wno-error=" form, which still displays the warnings but does
not make it an error, and all of the above will be re-considered
as either being "fix me" (warning still displayed) or "warning
is wrong."
route command exits if it receives <count> routing messages where
<count> is a value specified by -c.
The option is useful to get only particular message(s) in a test script.
By this change, nexthop caches (IP-MAC address pair) are not stored
in the routing table anymore. Instead nexthop caches are stored in
each network interface; we already have lltable/llentry data structure
for this purpose. This change also obsoletes the concept of cloning/cloned
routes. Cloned routes no longer exist while cloning routes still exist
with renamed to connected routes.
Noticeable changes are:
- Nexthop caches aren't listed in route show/netstat -r
- sysctl(NET_RT_DUMP) doesn't return them
- If RTF_LLDATA is specified, it returns nexthop caches
- Several definitions of routing flags and messages are removed
- RTF_CLONING, RTF_XRESOLVE, RTF_LLINFO, RTF_CLONED and RTM_RESOLVE
- RTF_CONNECTED is added
- It has the same value of RTF_CLONING for backward compatibility
- route's -xresolve, -[no]cloned and -llinfo options are removed
- -[no]cloning remains because it seems there are users
- -[no]connected is introduced and recommended
to be used instead of -[no]cloning
- route show/netstat -r drops some flags
- 'L' and 'c' are not seen anymore
- 'C' now indicates a connected route
- Gateway value of a route of an interface address is now not
a L2 address but "link#N" like a connected (cloning) route
- Proxy ARP: "arp -s ... pub" doesn't create a route
You can know details of behavior changes by seeing diffs under tests/.
Proposed on tech-net and tech-kern:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-net/2016/03/11/msg005701.html
getaddrinfo and if_nametoindex are newly added to interpret interface names
in IPv6 link-local addresses. if_nametoindex looks not used in rump.route,
but it is needed because it is used indirectly from getaddrinfo.
From s-yamaguchi@IIJ
they are created on the fly. This makes it clear what the route is for
and allows an optimisation in ip_output() by avoiding a call to
in_broadcast() because most of the time we do talk to a host.
It also avoids a needless allocation for the storage of llinfo_arp and
thus vanishes from arp(8) - it showed as incomplete anyway so this
is a nice side effect.
Guard against this and routes marked with RTF_BLACKHOLE in
ip_fastforward().
While here, guard against routes marked with RTF_BLACKHOLE in
ip6_fastforward().
RTF_BROADCAST is IPv4 only, so don't bother checking that here.
pointers but missed (char *)&soup->so_foo => (char *)soup->so_foo in
mask_addr(). It worked by luck - unless it didn't: due to pointer
numerology on amd64 route add -net ClassC without explicit /24 prefix
length specification would result into /16 destination instead of /24.
martin