The test modifies if_capabilities for all available interfaces.
This is not a behavior we expect for normal ATF runs.
Similar tests modifying living network configurations are already
skipped by default. This is the last one remained for ifconfig(8).
Also, I'm not sure whether this is a test for ifconfig(8).
XXX
Pullup to netbsd-10 ASAP. No other branches are affected.
---
date: 2020-07-27 09:57:44 -0700; author: gson; state: Exp; lines: +6 -1; commitid: m3HouRBlhyJQVJhC;
Skip the repeated_link_addr test by default as it causes the
evbarm-aarch64 testbed to hang (PR port-evbarm/55521), and will not be
safe to run by default even after that bug is fixed, for similar
reasons as t_repeated_updown.
---
t_repeated_mtu.sh changes the MTU, which may cause NFS to fail.
if you have NFS root, this is system killing.
t_repeated_scan.sh kills and restarts both hostapd and
wpa_supplicant.
evbarm-aarch64 testbed to hang (PR port-evbarm/55521), and will not be
safe to run by default even after that bug is fixed, for similar
reasons as t_repeated_updown.
repeated_updown test case unless explicitly enabled with "atf-run -v
run_unsafe=yes". Gratuitously configuring interfaces "up" is no more
safe than gratuitously configuring them "down"; for example, it could
lead to accidentally connecting to an insecure network or diverting
traffic from the desired route.
takes parameters. Based on quick testing, iwn(4) and wm(4) pass, but
urtwn(4) panics. Use at your own risk; in some cases, it may be possible
that horrors are written directly to the hardware.
rin