appeared and whether it's really part of pf or not is still unclear. Looking
at the other *BSDs it seems that they have left out spamd when importing pf,
and now we do that too. Also, the name conflicted with another more popular
used tool, after the rename to pfspamd it was left with completely unusable
documentation which apparently no-one wanted to fix.
A port of the latest spamd will be imported into pkgsrc soon.
Suggested by several people, no objections on last proposal on tech-userlevel.
`spamd-setup', and `spamdb' as `pfspamd', `pfspamd-setup', and `pfspamdb'.
To quote Steven M. Bellovin:
This [having a program in basesrc with the same name as a widely used and
completely different program in pkgsrc] is a seriously bad idea; it
violates the rule of least surprise. That's bad enough in normal
situations; here, we're talking about security. You do *not* want to
confuse people about security features; they're hard enough to get right
as is.
headers and LKM.
Add MKPF; if set to no, don't build and install the pf(4) programs,
headers, LKM and spamd.
Both options default to yes, so nothing changed in the default build.
Reviewed by lukem.
some files were imported to the different places from the previous version.
v3_5:
etc/pf.conf
etc/pf.os
etc/spamd.conf
share/man/man4/pf.4
share/man/man4/pflog.4
share/man/man5/pf.conf.5
share/man/man5/pf.os.5
share/man/man5/spamd.conf.5
v3_6:
dist/pf/etc/pf.conf
dist/pf/etc/pf.os
dist/pf/etc/spamd.conf
dist/pf/share/man/man4/pf.4
dist/pf/share/man/man4/pflog.4
dist/pf/share/man/man5/pf.conf.5
dist/pf/share/man/man5/pf.os.5
dist/pf/share/man/man5/spamd.conf.5
peter