Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
pooka
94e5abaaf2 Disable test cases which have not worked in ages instead of skipping them. 2010-12-18 13:06:51 +00:00
jmmv
decf2b5e0f Adjusts tests after import of atf-0.12:
- The use.fs property is gone.
- Mark the tests/fs/t_create:attrs test as broken when using the default
  unprivileged-user:_atf setting.  This probably deserves a fix somehow
  but I'm not sure at this point.
2010-11-07 17:51:16 +00:00
jmmv
b27e7b1e81 Oh, wow. Loads of broken ipf test cases that went unnoticed because they
were unchecked errors.  Fix them.

These have been caught by the upcoming version of atf, which explicitly
does 'set -e' in shell test programs.
2010-10-19 16:36:36 +00:00
jmmv
9d0b4b5bb8 Get rid of static Atffiles and let bsd.test.mk generate them on the fly. 2010-07-13 21:13:21 +00:00
jmmv
f8a35c46be Do not use awk to generate the test program. Use some eval magic to generate
the tests on the fly alongside with easier-to-read functions.

While doing this, split the big monolithic test program into more granular
but cohesive test programs.

Phew, this one was tough.  And it's horrible to see that many these tests
(yes, the tests themselves probably) are broken.
2010-07-10 17:28:36 +00:00
pooka
062f78a69a Skip failing tests. When someone figures out where the problem is,
these can be reenabled.
2010-06-12 14:07:18 +00:00
jmmv
6b84fb92ac atf-0.9 introduces an use.fs test-case property to allow tests to write to
their work directory.  The purpose is to be able to know which tests intend
to touch the file system and to allow a minor optimization in atf-run.

Define use.fs=true for all those tests requiring it.  (This highlights that
some tests currently require modifying the file system but conceptually
they shouldn't be... which leaves room for further improvements/cleanups
later :-)
2010-06-04 08:39:40 +00:00
jmmv
b9daf172a0 Add the ipf tests developed by Lukasz Strzygowski as part of the atfify
GSoC 2008 project.  These were originally inside the kernel subdirectory
but I think they belong in their own top-level directory because ipf
consists of more components than just the kernel-level packet filter.
2009-02-20 21:42:59 +00:00