Fixed issues with uvm_physseg_plug test case.
There is a condition check which failed for VM_PHYSSEG_MAX == 2 (not for 1 or 3 and above), in case of 2, pgs == slab + npages1 + npages3, so we need to change ">" check to ">=" check. Reviewed by <cherry>
This commit is contained in:
parent
497a8f2bfd
commit
ff43743a55
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||||
/* $NetBSD: t_uvm_physseg.c,v 1.5 2019/01/16 13:21:02 fox Exp $ */
|
/* $NetBSD: t_uvm_physseg.c,v 1.6 2019/01/16 13:35:51 fox Exp $ */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*-
|
/*-
|
||||||
* Copyright (c) 2015, 2016 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
* Copyright (c) 2015, 2016 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
||||||
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
|
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
|
||||||
__RCSID("$NetBSD: t_uvm_physseg.c,v 1.5 2019/01/16 13:21:02 fox Exp $");
|
__RCSID("$NetBSD: t_uvm_physseg.c,v 1.6 2019/01/16 13:35:51 fox Exp $");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* If this line is commented out tests related to uvm_physseg_get_pmseg()
|
* If this line is commented out tests related to uvm_physseg_get_pmseg()
|
||||||
|
@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ ATF_TC_BODY(uvm_physseg_plug, tc)
|
||||||
ATF_REQUIRE_EQ(uvm_physseg_plug(VALID_START_PFN_4, npages4, &upm4), true);
|
ATF_REQUIRE_EQ(uvm_physseg_plug(VALID_START_PFN_4, npages4, &upm4), true);
|
||||||
/* The hot plug slab should have nothing to do with the original slab */
|
/* The hot plug slab should have nothing to do with the original slab */
|
||||||
pgs = uvm_physseg_get_pg(upm4, 0);
|
pgs = uvm_physseg_get_pg(upm4, 0);
|
||||||
ATF_REQUIRE(pgs < slab || pgs > (slab + npages1
|
ATF_REQUIRE(pgs < slab || pgs >= (slab + npages1
|
||||||
#if VM_PHYSSEG_MAX > 2
|
#if VM_PHYSSEG_MAX > 2
|
||||||
+ npages2
|
+ npages2
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue