add another QUEUEDEBUG check: in TAILQ_REMOVE(), if the element we're
removing has no next element, verify that the queue head agrees that the current element is the last one. (this is how I found the recent ppc pmap bugs).
This commit is contained in:
parent
4017fd1809
commit
f17273fd1e
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: queue.h,v 1.31 2002/06/01 23:51:05 lukem Exp $ */
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: queue.h,v 1.32 2002/10/22 04:50:38 chs Exp $ */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 1991, 1993
|
||||
@ -343,6 +343,11 @@ struct { \
|
||||
panic("TAILQ_* forw %p %s:%d", (elm), __FILE__, __LINE__);\
|
||||
if (*(elm)->field.tqe_prev != (elm)) \
|
||||
panic("TAILQ_* back %p %s:%d", (elm), __FILE__, __LINE__);
|
||||
#define QUEUEDEBUG_TAILQ_PREREMOVE(head, elm, field) \
|
||||
if ((elm)->field.tqe_next == NULL && \
|
||||
(head)->tqh_last != &(elm)->field.tqe_next) \
|
||||
panic("TAILQ_PREREMOVE head %p elm %p %s:%d", \
|
||||
(head), (elm), __FILE__, __LINE__);
|
||||
#define QUEUEDEBUG_TAILQ_POSTREMOVE(elm, field) \
|
||||
(elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)1L; \
|
||||
(elm)->field.tqe_prev = (void *)1L;
|
||||
@ -350,6 +355,7 @@ struct { \
|
||||
#define QUEUEDEBUG_TAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(head, elm, field)
|
||||
#define QUEUEDEBUG_TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(head, elm, field)
|
||||
#define QUEUEDEBUG_TAILQ_OP(elm, field)
|
||||
#define QUEUEDEBUG_TAILQ_PREREMOVE(head, elm, field)
|
||||
#define QUEUEDEBUG_TAILQ_POSTREMOVE(elm, field)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
@ -397,6 +403,7 @@ struct { \
|
||||
} while (/*CONSTCOND*/0)
|
||||
|
||||
#define TAILQ_REMOVE(head, elm, field) do { \
|
||||
QUEUEDEBUG_TAILQ_PREREMOVE((head), (elm), field) \
|
||||
QUEUEDEBUG_TAILQ_OP((elm), field) \
|
||||
if (((elm)->field.tqe_next) != NULL) \
|
||||
(elm)->field.tqe_next->field.tqe_prev = \
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user