Remove obsolete comment.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d6908bb21a
commit
e7c35aabc9
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||||
/* $NetBSD: pthread_types.h,v 1.5 2003/09/26 22:48:23 nathanw Exp $ */
|
/* $NetBSD: pthread_types.h,v 1.6 2007/05/02 21:54:16 ad Exp $ */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*-
|
/*-
|
||||||
* Copyright (c) 2001 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
* Copyright (c) 2001 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
||||||
|
@ -89,23 +89,17 @@ struct __pthread_attr_st {
|
||||||
void *pta_private;
|
void *pta_private;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* ptm_lock will never be spun on: it's locked with
|
||||||
|
* pthread__simple_lock_try() or not at all.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
struct __pthread_mutex_st {
|
struct __pthread_mutex_st {
|
||||||
unsigned int ptm_magic;
|
unsigned int ptm_magic;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Not a real spinlock; will never be spun on. Locked with
|
|
||||||
* pthread__simple_lock_try() or not at all. Therefore, not
|
|
||||||
* subject to preempted-spinlock-continuation.
|
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* Open research question: Would it help threaded applications if
|
|
||||||
* preempted-lock-continuation were applied to mutexes?
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
pthread_spin_t ptm_lock;
|
pthread_spin_t ptm_lock;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Protects the owner and blocked queue */
|
|
||||||
pthread_spin_t ptm_interlock;
|
pthread_spin_t ptm_interlock;
|
||||||
pthread_t ptm_owner;
|
pthread_t ptm_owner;
|
||||||
struct pthread_queue_t ptm_blocked;
|
struct pthread_queue_t ptm_blocked;
|
||||||
void *ptm_private;
|
void *ptm_private;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define _PT_MUTEX_MAGIC 0x33330003
|
#define _PT_MUTEX_MAGIC 0x33330003
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue