Nuke strings(1). It isn't used by anything, and we just recently switched

the userland strings(1) to the binutils version. Well, crunchgen(8) links
all the stuff together ... can you say: "GPL pollution"?

If anyone knows a good reason to have strings(1) on an install disk, I can
resurrect a BSD-licensed strings. "Send me email". (ross@netbsd.org)
This commit is contained in:
ross 1998-09-22 01:15:53 +00:00
parent b3f966c92a
commit d51c5fbcfc

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# $NetBSD: md_install.conf,v 1.2 1997/12/22 00:39:37 cjs Exp $
# $NetBSD: md_install.conf,v 1.3 1998/09/22 01:15:53 ross Exp $
#
# ramdiskbin.conf - unified binary for the install ramdisk
#
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ progs cat chmod chown chroot cp df disklabel ed
progs fsck fsck_ffs gzip ln mkdir mknod
progs mount mount_cd9660 mount_ffs mount_kernfs mount_msdos mount_nfs
progs mt mv newfs ping pwd reboot rm sed shutdown slattach
progs strings stty sync tar test tip umount update
progs stty sync tar test tip umount update
progs installboot
ln chown chgrp