Make the segment lock aware of LWPs. Fixes a (somewhat confusing)
"lockmgr: pid 3997, not exclusive lockholder 3997, unlocking" panic I encountered while running blogbench on an LFS.
This commit is contained in:
parent
712aacb6d4
commit
d28248e84e
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
/* $NetBSD: lfs.h,v 1.97 2006/03/24 20:05:32 perseant Exp $ */
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: lfs.h,v 1.98 2006/04/07 23:44:14 perseant Exp $ */
|
||||
|
||||
/*-
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
||||
|
@ -768,6 +768,7 @@ struct lfs {
|
|||
struct vnode *lfs_ivnode; /* vnode for the ifile */
|
||||
u_int32_t lfs_seglock; /* single-thread the segment writer */
|
||||
pid_t lfs_lockpid; /* pid of lock holder */
|
||||
lwpid_t lfs_locklwp; /* lwp of lock holder */
|
||||
u_int32_t lfs_iocount; /* number of ios pending */
|
||||
u_int32_t lfs_writer; /* don't allow any dirops to start */
|
||||
u_int32_t lfs_dirops; /* count of active directory ops */
|
||||
|
@ -1059,7 +1060,9 @@ struct lfs_fcntl_markv {
|
|||
#ifdef _KERNEL
|
||||
/* XXX MP */
|
||||
#define LFS_SEGLOCK_HELD(fs) \
|
||||
((fs)->lfs_seglock != 0 && (fs)->lfs_lockpid == curproc->p_pid)
|
||||
((fs)->lfs_seglock != 0 && \
|
||||
(fs)->lfs_lockpid == curproc->p_pid && \
|
||||
(fs)->lfs_locklwp == curlwp->l_lid)
|
||||
#endif /* _KERNEL */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Debug segment lock */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
/* $NetBSD: lfs_subr.c,v 1.57 2006/03/24 20:05:32 perseant Exp $ */
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: lfs_subr.c,v 1.58 2006/04/07 23:44:14 perseant Exp $ */
|
||||
|
||||
/*-
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
||||
|
@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
|
|||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
|
||||
__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: lfs_subr.c,v 1.57 2006/03/24 20:05:32 perseant Exp $");
|
||||
__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: lfs_subr.c,v 1.58 2006/04/07 23:44:14 perseant Exp $");
|
||||
|
||||
#include <sys/param.h>
|
||||
#include <sys/systm.h>
|
||||
|
@ -297,7 +297,8 @@ lfs_seglock(struct lfs *fs, unsigned long flags)
|
|||
|
||||
simple_lock(&fs->lfs_interlock);
|
||||
if (fs->lfs_seglock) {
|
||||
if (fs->lfs_lockpid == curproc->p_pid) {
|
||||
if (fs->lfs_lockpid == curproc->p_pid &&
|
||||
fs->lfs_locklwp == curlwp->l_lid) {
|
||||
simple_unlock(&fs->lfs_interlock);
|
||||
++fs->lfs_seglock;
|
||||
fs->lfs_sp->seg_flags |= flags;
|
||||
|
@ -315,6 +316,7 @@ lfs_seglock(struct lfs *fs, unsigned long flags)
|
|||
|
||||
fs->lfs_seglock = 1;
|
||||
fs->lfs_lockpid = curproc->p_pid;
|
||||
fs->lfs_locklwp = curlwp->l_lid;
|
||||
simple_unlock(&fs->lfs_interlock);
|
||||
fs->lfs_cleanind = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -509,6 +511,7 @@ lfs_segunlock(struct lfs *fs)
|
|||
simple_lock(&fs->lfs_interlock);
|
||||
--fs->lfs_seglock;
|
||||
fs->lfs_lockpid = 0;
|
||||
fs->lfs_locklwp = 0;
|
||||
simple_unlock(&fs->lfs_interlock);
|
||||
wakeup(&fs->lfs_seglock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -552,6 +555,7 @@ lfs_segunlock(struct lfs *fs)
|
|||
simple_lock(&fs->lfs_interlock);
|
||||
--fs->lfs_seglock;
|
||||
fs->lfs_lockpid = 0;
|
||||
fs->lfs_locklwp = 0;
|
||||
simple_unlock(&fs->lfs_interlock);
|
||||
wakeup(&fs->lfs_seglock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue