Aren/NetBSD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

explicitly note MALLOC-free and malloc-FREE is ok.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
yamt 2003-06-19 15:11:49 +00:00
parent e0b0d04377
commit b509ec99bb
1 changed files with 11 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
share/man/man9/malloc.9
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
.\" $NetBSD: malloc.9,v 1.31 2003/04/16 13:35:30 wiz Exp $
.\" $NetBSD: malloc.9,v 1.32 2003/06/19 15:11:49 yamt Exp $
.\"
.\" Copyright (c) 1996, 2003 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
.\" All rights reserved.
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
.\" ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
.\" POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
.\"
.Dd January 31, 2003
.Dd June 19, 2003
.Dt MALLOC 9
.Os
.Sh NAME
@ -141,12 +141,18 @@ The
macro is intended to be used with a compile-time constant
.Fa size
so that the compiler can do constant folding.
The
In the comparison to
.Fn malloc
and
.Fn free
functions, the
.Fn MALLOC
and
.Fn FREE
macros may be faster for some fixed-size allocations, at the cost of
increased code size.
macros may be faster, at the cost of increased code size.
There is no difference between the memory allocated with MALLOC and malloc.
i.e., no matter which MALLOC or malloc is used to allocate the memory,
either FREE or free can be used to free it.
.Pp
Unlike its standard C library counterpart
.Pq Xr malloc 3 ,