Aren
/
NetBSD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

correct comment for lfs_putpages

This commit is contained in:
perseant 2007-04-05 17:44:18 +00:00
parent a926b97a8e
commit b196644e3b
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/* $NetBSD: lfs_vnops.c,v 1.201 2007/03/04 06:03:46 christos Exp $ */
/* $NetBSD: lfs_vnops.c,v 1.202 2007/04/05 17:44:18 perseant Exp $ */
/*-
* Copyright (c) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
*/
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: lfs_vnops.c,v 1.201 2007/03/04 06:03:46 christos Exp $");
__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: lfs_vnops.c,v 1.202 2007/04/05 17:44:18 perseant Exp $");
#ifdef _KERNEL_OPT
#include "opt_compat_netbsd.h"
@ -1840,11 +1840,11 @@ check_dirty(struct lfs *fs, struct vnode *vp,
* but the expanded range is dirty.
*
* (2) It needs to explicitly send blocks to be written when it is done.
* VOP_PUTPAGES is not ever called with the seglock held, so
* we simply take the seglock and let lfs_segunlock wait for us.
* XXX Actually we can be called with the seglock held, if we have
* XXX to flush a vnode while lfs_markv is in operation. As of this
* XXX writing we panic in this case.
* If VOP_PUTPAGES is called without the seglock held, we simply take
* the seglock and let lfs_segunlock wait for us.
* XXX There might be a bad situation if we have to flush a vnode while
* XXX lfs_markv is in operation. As of this writing we panic in this
* XXX case.
*
* Assumptions:
*