add a check for correct order of destructor calls (from the gcc mailing

list) which points at a misconfiguration at our side
(cxa_atexit not used)

regress/usr.bin/Makefile

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
-#	$NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.14 2007/02/19 19:42:50 rmind Exp $
+#	$NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.15 2007/09/17 17:37:48 drochner Exp $
 
-SUBDIR+= basename bzip2 config cut dirname grep gzip m4 make rtld sdiff sort xlint
+SUBDIR+= basename bzip2 c++ config cut dirname grep gzip m4 make rtld
+SUBDIR+= sdiff sort xlint
 
 .include <bsd.subdir.mk>

regress/usr.bin/c++/Makefile

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.1 2007/09/17 17:37:48 drochner Exp $
+
+SUBDIR=	static_destructor
+
+.include <bsd.subdir.mk>

regress/usr.bin/c++/static_destructor/Makefile

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.1 2007/09/17 17:37:48 drochner Exp $
+
+PROG_CXX=	static_destructor
+NOMAN=		# defined
+
+regress:
+	./${PROG} > out && diff out ${.CURDIR}/expected
+
+CLEANFILES+=	out
+
+.include <bsd.prog.mk>

regress/usr.bin/c++/static_destructor/expected

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+constructor A
+constructor B
+destructor B : i = 1
+destructor A : i = 10

regress/usr.bin/c++/static_destructor/static_destructor.cc

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/* $NetBSD: static_destructor.cc,v 1.1 2007/09/17 17:37:49 drochner Exp $ */
+
+/*
+ * Tests proper order of destructor calls
+ * (must be in reverse order of constructor completion).
+ * from the gcc mailing list
+ */
+
+#include <iostream>
+using namespace std;
+
+class A 
+{
+public:
+	int     i;
+	A(int j) : i(j) { cout << "constructor A" << endl; }
+	~A() { cout << "destructor A : i = " << i << endl; }
+};
+
+class B 
+{
+public:
+	A *n;
+	B() {
+		static A p(1);
+		n = &p;
+		cout << "constructor B" << endl;
+	}
+	~B() {
+		cout << "destructor B : i = " << n->i << endl;
+		n->i = 10;
+	}
+};
+
+class B x1;
+
+int main (void) { return 0; }