diff --git a/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/gcc_attribute_stmt.c b/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/gcc_attribute_stmt.c
index db6104ca9eb9..6cd32f89daf7 100644
--- a/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/gcc_attribute_stmt.c
+++ b/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/gcc_attribute_stmt.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$NetBSD: gcc_attribute_stmt.c,v 1.1 2021/07/06 17:33:07 rillig Exp $	*/
+/*	$NetBSD: gcc_attribute_stmt.c,v 1.2 2022/04/28 07:10:39 rillig Exp $	*/
 # 3 "gcc_attribute_stmt.c"
 
 /*
@@ -34,3 +34,24 @@ attribute_fallthrough(int i)
 		    __attribute__((__fallthrough__));
 	}
 }
+
+/*
+ * Despite being undocumented, GCC 10 accepts __attribute__((__unused__))
+ * at the beginning of a statement.
+ */
+void
+unused_statements(int x)
+{
+	switch (x) {
+	case 3:
+		__attribute__((__unused__))
+		/* expect+1: error: syntax error 'break' [249] */
+		break;
+	case 4:
+		goto label;
+	label:
+		__attribute__((__unused__))
+		/* expect+1: error: syntax error 'return' [249] */
+		return;
+	}
+}
diff --git a/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/gcc_attribute_stmt.exp b/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/gcc_attribute_stmt.exp
index 8eb38b00dafc..4f8f75a5a75f 100644
--- a/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/gcc_attribute_stmt.exp
+++ b/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/gcc_attribute_stmt.exp
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
 gcc_attribute_stmt.c(34): error: syntax error '__attribute__' [249]
+gcc_attribute_stmt.c(49): error: syntax error 'break' [249]
+gcc_attribute_stmt.c(55): error: syntax error 'return' [249]