fix one more flash_addr_t fallout

This commit is contained in:
ahoka 2011-04-04 18:30:07 +00:00
parent 0d74ee67d3
commit 76a36edbfd
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/* $NetBSD: flashctl.c,v 1.2 2011/03/20 06:10:27 ahoka Exp $ */
/* $NetBSD: flashctl.c,v 1.3 2011/04/04 18:30:07 ahoka Exp $ */
/*-
* Copyright (c) 2010 Department of Software Engineering,
@ -137,10 +137,10 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
printf("\n");
/* TODO: humanize */
printf("Capacity %jd Mbytes, %jd pages, %zu bytes/page\n",
printf("Capacity %jd Mbytes, %jd pages, %ju bytes/page\n",
(intmax_t )ip.ip_flash_size / 1024 / 1024,
(intmax_t )ip.ip_flash_size / ip.ip_page_size,
ip.ip_page_size);
(intmax_t )ip.ip_page_size);
if (ip.ip_flash_type == FLASH_TYPE_NAND) {
printf("Block size %jd Kbytes, %jd pages/block\n",
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
} else if (!strcmp("badblocks", command)) {
struct flash_info_params ip;
struct flash_badblock_params bbp;
flash_addr_t addr;
flash_off_t addr;
bool hasbad = false;
error = ioctl(fd, FLASH_GET_INFO, &ip);
@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
printf("No bad blocks found.\n");
}
} else if (!strcmp("markbad", command)) {
flash_addr_t address;
flash_off_t address;
/* TODO: maybe we should let the user specify
* multiple blocks?