Correct a comment long since outdated.
This commit is contained in:
parent
24af362f60
commit
766d429d62
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
/* $NetBSD: intr.c,v 1.1 1997/04/14 02:28:44 thorpej Exp $ */
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: intr.c,v 1.2 1997/05/01 16:24:26 thorpej Exp $ */
|
||||
|
||||
/*-
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 1996, 1997 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
||||
|
@ -179,18 +179,9 @@ intr_establish(func, arg, ipl, priority)
|
|||
* Some devices are particularly sensitive to interrupt
|
||||
* handling latency. The DCA, for example, can lose many
|
||||
* characters if its interrupt isn't handled with reasonable
|
||||
* speed.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* To work around this problem, each device can give itself a
|
||||
* "priority". An unbuffered DCA would give itself a higher
|
||||
* priority than a SCSI device, for example.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is necessary because of the flat spl scheme employed by
|
||||
* the hp300. Each device can be set from ipl 3 to ipl 5, which
|
||||
* in turn means that splbio, splnet, and spltty must all be at
|
||||
* spl5.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Don't blame me...I just work here.
|
||||
* speed. For this reason, we sort ISRs by IPL_* priority,
|
||||
* inserting higher priority interrupts before lower priority
|
||||
* interrupts.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue