Fix a race condition of low priority xcall

xc_lowpri and xc_thread are racy and xc_wait may return during/before
executing all xcall callbacks, resulting in a kernel panic at worst.

xc_lowpri serializes multiple jobs by a mutex and a cv. If all xcall
callbacks are done, xc_wait returns and also xc_lowpri accepts a next job.

The problem is that a counter that counts the number of finished xcall
callbacks is incremented *before* actually executing a xcall callback
(see xc_tailp++ in xc_thread). So xc_lowpri accepts a next job before
all xcall callbacks complete and a next job begins to run its xcall callbacks.

Even worse the counter is global and shared between jobs, so if a xcall
callback of the next job completes, the shared counter is incremented,
which confuses wc_wait of the previous job as all xcall callbacks of the
previous job are done and wc_wait of the previous job returns during/before
executing its xcall callbacks.

How to fix: there are actually two counters that count the number of finished
xcall callbacks for low priority xcall for historical reasons (I guess):
xc_tailp and xc_low_pri.xc_donep. xc_low_pri.xc_donep is incremented correctly
while xc_tailp is incremented wrongly, i.e., before executing a xcall callback.
We can fix the issue by dropping xc_tailp and using only xc_low_pri.xc_donep.

PR kern/51632
This commit is contained in:
ozaki-r 2016-11-21 00:54:21 +00:00
parent ed4a54337c
commit 6f15561386

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/* $NetBSD: subr_xcall.c,v 1.18 2013/11/26 21:13:05 rmind Exp $ */
/* $NetBSD: subr_xcall.c,v 1.19 2016/11/21 00:54:21 ozaki-r Exp $ */
/*-
* Copyright (c) 2007-2010 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
*/
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: subr_xcall.c,v 1.18 2013/11/26 21:13:05 rmind Exp $");
__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: subr_xcall.c,v 1.19 2016/11/21 00:54:21 ozaki-r Exp $");
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/param.h>
@ -105,7 +105,6 @@ typedef struct {
/* Low priority xcall structures. */
static xc_state_t xc_low_pri __cacheline_aligned;
static uint64_t xc_tailp __cacheline_aligned;
/* High priority xcall structures. */
static xc_state_t xc_high_pri __cacheline_aligned;
@ -134,7 +133,6 @@ xc_init(void)
memset(xclo, 0, sizeof(xc_state_t));
mutex_init(&xclo->xc_lock, MUTEX_DEFAULT, IPL_NONE);
cv_init(&xclo->xc_busy, "xclocv");
xc_tailp = 0;
memset(xchi, 0, sizeof(xc_state_t));
mutex_init(&xchi->xc_lock, MUTEX_DEFAULT, IPL_SOFTSERIAL);
@ -256,7 +254,7 @@ xc_lowpri(xcfunc_t func, void *arg1, void *arg2, struct cpu_info *ci)
uint64_t where;
mutex_enter(&xc->xc_lock);
while (xc->xc_headp != xc_tailp) {
while (xc->xc_headp != xc->xc_donep) {
cv_wait(&xc->xc_busy, &xc->xc_lock);
}
xc->xc_arg1 = arg1;
@ -277,7 +275,7 @@ xc_lowpri(xcfunc_t func, void *arg1, void *arg2, struct cpu_info *ci)
ci->ci_data.cpu_xcall_pending = true;
cv_signal(&ci->ci_data.cpu_xcall);
}
KASSERT(xc_tailp < xc->xc_headp);
KASSERT(xc->xc_donep < xc->xc_headp);
where = xc->xc_headp;
mutex_exit(&xc->xc_lock);
@ -302,7 +300,7 @@ xc_thread(void *cookie)
mutex_enter(&xc->xc_lock);
for (;;) {
while (!ci->ci_data.cpu_xcall_pending) {
if (xc->xc_headp == xc_tailp) {
if (xc->xc_headp == xc->xc_donep) {
cv_broadcast(&xc->xc_busy);
}
cv_wait(&ci->ci_data.cpu_xcall, &xc->xc_lock);
@ -312,7 +310,6 @@ xc_thread(void *cookie)
func = xc->xc_func;
arg1 = xc->xc_arg1;
arg2 = xc->xc_arg2;
xc_tailp++;
mutex_exit(&xc->xc_lock);
KASSERT(func != NULL);