tests/lint: fix test for message 132 to be platform-independent
On i386, the test failed because the warning in line 101 was not generated. This was because size_t on i386 is unsigned int (see arch/i386/targparam.h, SIZEOF_TSPEC). The result of the multiplication had type unsigned int, and message 132 does not trigger for a conversion from unsigned int to signed int because both types have the same size (see check_integer_conversion, portable_size_in_bits). Change the involved type from size_t (which the original code used) to unsigned long long (which is uint64_t on all platforms supported by lint), so that the warning is generated on all platforms in the same way.
This commit is contained in:
parent
14613ee08f
commit
65a6a5ed58
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
/* $NetBSD: msg_132.c,v 1.7 2022/04/19 22:40:13 rillig Exp $ */
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: msg_132.c,v 1.8 2022/04/20 22:50:56 rillig Exp $ */
|
||||
# 3 "msg_132.c"
|
||||
|
||||
// Test for message: conversion from '%s' to '%s' may lose accuracy [132]
|
||||
|
@ -97,6 +97,6 @@ non_constant_expression(void)
|
|||
* that the conversion will always succeed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const int not_a_constant = 8;
|
||||
/* expect+1: warning: conversion from 'unsigned long' to 'int' may lose accuracy [132] */
|
||||
return sizeof(double) + not_a_constant * sizeof(char *);
|
||||
/* expect+1: warning: conversion from 'unsigned long long' to 'int' may lose accuracy [132] */
|
||||
return not_a_constant * 8ULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ msg_132.c(55): warning: conversion from 'long long' to 'short' may lose accuracy
|
|||
msg_132.c(59): warning: conversion from 'long long' to 'int' may lose accuracy [132]
|
||||
msg_132.c(85): error: operands of '+' have incompatible types (pointer != double) [107]
|
||||
msg_132.c(85): warning: function 'cover_build_plus_minus' expects to return value [214]
|
||||
msg_132.c(101): warning: conversion from 'unsigned long' to 'int' may lose accuracy [132]
|
||||
msg_132.c(101): warning: conversion from 'unsigned long long' to 'int' may lose accuracy [132]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue