Change comments about algorithms, 99.6% for random data isn't 'rare' in my book!

(The 'rare' case is any byte values 0x80-0xff.)
This commit is contained in:
dsl 2009-07-11 08:48:51 +00:00
parent 9a7f03a6bb
commit 5acd65fcb7
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
#include <machine/asm.h>
#if defined(LIBC_SCCS)
RCSID("$NetBSD: strlen.S,v 1.1 2005/12/20 19:28:51 christos Exp $")
RCSID("$NetBSD: strlen.S,v 1.2 2009/07/11 08:48:51 dsl Exp $")
#endif
ENTRY(strlen)
@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ ENTRY(strlen)
* (3) ((x - 0x01....01) & 0x80....80)
*
* always evaluates to a non-zero value if any of the bytes in
* the original word is zero. However, in rare cases, it also
* evaluates to a non-zero value when none of the bytes in the
* original word is zero.
* the original word is zero or has the top bit set.
* For strings that are likely to only contain 7-bit ascii these
* false positives will be rare.
*
* To account for possible false positives, each byte of the
* original word must be checked when the expression evaluates to
@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ ENTRY(strlen)
je .Lloop
/*
* In rare cases, the above loop may exit prematurely. We must
* For bytes 0x80-0xff the above loop will exit prematurely. We must
* return to the loop if none of the bytes in the word equal 0.
*/
cmpb $0,-8(%rax) /* 1st byte == 0? */