From 59b8f11a8bbda074afd3df5b64a67f38238ded8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: dyoung Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:28:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in comment, s/SIOCSIFADDR/SIOCINITIFADDR/. --- sys/netinet6/in6_ifattach.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys/netinet6/in6_ifattach.c b/sys/netinet6/in6_ifattach.c index 995646afcd78..7a851ef5c894 100644 --- a/sys/netinet6/in6_ifattach.c +++ b/sys/netinet6/in6_ifattach.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* $NetBSD: in6_ifattach.c,v 1.81 2008/11/07 00:20:18 dyoung Exp $ */ +/* $NetBSD: in6_ifattach.c,v 1.82 2009/07/30 17:28:36 dyoung Exp $ */ /* $KAME: in6_ifattach.c,v 1.124 2001/07/18 08:32:51 jinmei Exp $ */ /* @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ */ #include -__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: in6_ifattach.c,v 1.81 2008/11/07 00:20:18 dyoung Exp $"); +__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: in6_ifattach.c,v 1.82 2009/07/30 17:28:36 dyoung Exp $"); #include #include @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ in6_ifattach_linklocal(struct ifnet *ifp, struct ifnet *altifp) IN6_IFAUPDATE_DADDELAY)) != 0) { /* * XXX: When the interface does not support IPv6, this call - * would fail in the SIOCSIFADDR ioctl. I believe the + * would fail in the SIOCINITIFADDR ioctl. I believe the * notification is rather confusing in this case, so just * suppress it. (jinmei@kame.net 20010130) */