Aren
/
NetBSD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Be *slightly* more consistent about the use of num and numraid in raidattach().

This commit is contained in:
oster 2000-02-25 02:21:12 +00:00
parent f5f2ad429c
commit 5716b5d6d1
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
sys/dev/raidframe/rf_netbsdkintf.c
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/* $NetBSD: rf_netbsdkintf.c,v 1.57 2000/02/24 01:23:05 oster Exp $ */
/* $NetBSD: rf_netbsdkintf.c,v 1.58 2000/02/25 02:21:12 oster Exp $ */
/*-
* Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
* All rights reserved.
@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ raidattach(num)
rf_sparet_wait_queue = rf_sparet_resp_queue = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < numraid; i++)
for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
raidPtrs[i] = NULL;
rc = rf_BootRaidframe();
if (rc == 0)
@ -2307,6 +2307,10 @@ rf_update_component_labels( raidPtr )
clabel.status = rf_ds_optimal;
/* bump the counter */
clabel.mod_counter++;
#if 0
/* note where this set was configured last */
clabel.last_unit = raidPtr->raidid;
#endif
#if DEBUG
if (raidPtr->mod_counter !=
clabel.mod_counter) {