Aren/NetBSD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

New sentence, new line.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
wiz 2011-08-02 10:28:00 +00:00
parent 593a132961
commit 1bd615d150
1 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
sbin/raidctl/raidctl.8
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
.\" $NetBSD: raidctl.8,v 1.62 2011/07/28 18:25:22 buhrow Exp $ .\" $NetBSD: raidctl.8,v 1.63 2011/08/02 10:28:00 wiz Exp $
.\" .\"
.\" Copyright (c) 1998, 2002 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. .\" Copyright (c) 1998, 2002 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
.\" All rights reserved. .\" All rights reserved.
@ -1600,8 +1600,9 @@ At least with RAID 0 there is no perception of increased data security.
.Pp .Pp
When replacing a failed component of a RAID set, it is a good When replacing a failed component of a RAID set, it is a good
idea to zero out the first 64 blocks of the new component to insure the idea to zero out the first 64 blocks of the new component to insure the
RAIDframe driver doesn't erroneously detect a component label in the RAIDframe driver doesn't erroneously detect a component label in the
new component. This is particularly true on new component.
This is particularly true on
.Em .Em
RAID 1 RAID 1
sets because there is at most one correct component label in a failed RAID sets because there is at most one correct component label in a failed RAID