We don't need to enforce the MAX_DMA_SIZE limit in dma_alloc();
this is handled properly by sbc_drq_intr() already.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f1f45fae7c
commit
18fd76201e
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
/* $NetBSD: ncr_sbc.c,v 1.8 1996/04/25 06:18:41 scottr Exp $ */
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: ncr_sbc.c,v 1.9 1996/04/25 14:40:26 scottr Exp $ */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 1996 Scott Reynolds
|
||||
|
@ -901,6 +901,7 @@ sbc_dma_alloc(ncr_sc)
|
|||
if (xlen < MIN_DMA_LEN)
|
||||
panic("sbc_dma_alloc: len=0x%x\n", xlen);
|
||||
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
/* XXX - should segment these instead */
|
||||
if (xlen > MAX_DMA_LEN) {
|
||||
printf("%s: excessive dma len=0x%x\n",
|
||||
|
@ -911,6 +912,7 @@ sbc_dma_alloc(ncr_sc)
|
|||
#endif
|
||||
ncr_sc->sc_datalen = xlen = MAX_DMA_LEN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Find free PDMA handle. Guaranteed to find one since we
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue