Remove comment about bus dma tag. I've been convinced otherwise.

This commit is contained in:
thorpej 1997-05-18 23:14:03 +00:00
parent 33f9641c2b
commit 14078d838d
2 changed files with 2 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/* $NetBSD: pchb.c,v 1.4 1997/05/18 05:29:24 thorpej Exp $ */
/* $NetBSD: pchb.c,v 1.5 1997/05/18 23:14:04 thorpej Exp $ */
/*-
* Copyright (c) 1996 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
@ -151,10 +151,6 @@ pchbattach(parent, self, aux)
/*
* This host bridge has a second PCI bus.
* Configure it.
*
* NOTE: The bus dma tag is not forwarded
* here since it will be picked up by
* pci_attach_hook().
*/
pba.pba_busname = "pci";
pba.pba_iot = pa->pa_iot;

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/* $NetBSD: pcib.c,v 1.2 1997/05/18 05:30:34 thorpej Exp $ */
/* $NetBSD: pcib.c,v 1.3 1997/05/18 23:14:03 thorpej Exp $ */
/*-
* Copyright (c) 1996 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
@ -124,10 +124,6 @@ pcib_callback(arg)
/*
* Attach the ISA bus behind this bridge.
*
* NOTE: The bus dma tag is not provided here, since
* it will be picked up by isa_attach_hook(). (We don't
* have access to it, anyhow.)
*/
bzero(&iba, sizeof(iba));
iba.iba_busname = "isa";