Take 2. Do a fairly mechanical reversion of the locking protocol
to that of revision 1.94. Add a comment documenting my best guess about the locking requirements in this subsystem. Don't take locks solely for the sake of stats counter increments; the locking around the increment of ->ncs_pass2 and/or ->ncs_2passes caused a deadlock. Defer fixing stats-keeping to allow this change to be easily backed out of.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d32449f312
commit
095b4dbc57
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: vfs_cache.c,v 1.101 2014/12/03 01:30:32 christos Exp $ */
|
||||
/* $NetBSD: vfs_cache.c,v 1.102 2014/12/07 22:23:38 dennis Exp $ */
|
||||
|
||||
/*-
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 2008 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
||||
@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
|
||||
__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: vfs_cache.c,v 1.101 2014/12/03 01:30:32 christos Exp $");
|
||||
__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: vfs_cache.c,v 1.102 2014/12/07 22:23:38 dennis Exp $");
|
||||
|
||||
#include "opt_ddb.h"
|
||||
#include "opt_revcache.h"
|
||||
@ -102,7 +102,39 @@ __KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: vfs_cache.c,v 1.101 2014/12/03 01:30:32 christos Exp
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Per-cpu namecache data.
|
||||
* The locking in this subsystem works as follows:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When an entry is added to the cache, via cache_enter(),
|
||||
* namecache_lock is taken to exclude other writers. The new
|
||||
* entry is added to the hash list in a way which permits
|
||||
* concurrent lookups and invalidations in the cache done on
|
||||
* other CPUs to continue in parallel.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When a lookup is done in the cache, via cache_lookup() or
|
||||
* cache_lookup_raw(), the per-cpu lock below is taken. This
|
||||
* protects calls to cache_lookup_entry() and cache_invalidate()
|
||||
* against cache_reclaim() but allows lookups to continue in
|
||||
* parallel with cache_enter().
|
||||
*
|
||||
* cache_revlookup() takes namecache_lock to exclude cache_enter()
|
||||
* and cache_reclaim() since the list it operates on is not
|
||||
* maintained to allow concurrent reads.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When cache_reclaim() is called namecache_lock is held to hold
|
||||
* off calls to cache_enter()/cache_revlookup() and each of the
|
||||
* per-cpu locks is taken to hold off lookups. Holding all these
|
||||
* locks essentially idles the subsystem, ensuring there are no
|
||||
* concurrent references to the cache entries being freed.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* As a side effect while running cache_reclaim(), once the per-cpu
|
||||
* locks are held the per-cpu stats are sampled, added to the
|
||||
* subsystem total and zeroed. Only some of the per-cpu stats are
|
||||
* incremented with the per-cpu lock held, however, and attempting
|
||||
* to add locking around the remaining counters currently
|
||||
* incremented without a lock can cause deadlock, so we don't
|
||||
* do that. XXX Fix this up in a later revision.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Per-cpu namecache data is defined next.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct nchcpu {
|
||||
kmutex_t cpu_lock;
|
||||
@ -286,7 +318,8 @@ cache_unlock_cpus(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Find a single cache entry and return it locked.
|
||||
* Find a single cache entry and return it locked. 'namecache_lock' or
|
||||
* at least one of the per-CPU locks must be held.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct namecache *
|
||||
cache_lookup_entry(const struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen)
|
||||
@ -296,7 +329,6 @@ cache_lookup_entry(const struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen)
|
||||
nchash_t hash;
|
||||
|
||||
KASSERT(dvp != NULL);
|
||||
KASSERT(mutex_owned(namecache_lock));
|
||||
hash = cache_hash(name, namelen);
|
||||
ncpp = &nchashtbl[NCHASH2(hash, dvp)];
|
||||
|
||||
@ -388,27 +420,22 @@ cache_lookup(struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cpup = curcpu()->ci_data.cpu_nch;
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
if (__predict_false(namelen > NCHNAMLEN)) {
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_long);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/* found nothing */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_enter(namecache_lock);
|
||||
ncp = cache_lookup_entry(dvp, name, namelen);
|
||||
mutex_exit(namecache_lock);
|
||||
if (__predict_false(ncp == NULL)) {
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_miss);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/* found nothing */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((cnflags & MAKEENTRY) == 0) {
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_badhits);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Last component and we are renaming or deleting,
|
||||
* the cache entry is invalid, or otherwise don't
|
||||
@ -416,6 +443,7 @@ cache_lookup(struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cache_invalidate(ncp);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&ncp->nc_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/* found nothing */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -432,16 +460,13 @@ cache_lookup(struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen,
|
||||
|
||||
if (__predict_true(nameiop != CREATE ||
|
||||
(cnflags & ISLASTCN) == 0)) {
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_neghits);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&ncp->nc_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/* found neg entry; vn is already null from above */
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_badhits);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Last component and we are renaming or
|
||||
* deleting, the cache entry is invalid,
|
||||
@ -450,6 +475,7 @@ cache_lookup(struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cache_invalidate(ncp);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&ncp->nc_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/* found nothing */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -458,6 +484,7 @@ cache_lookup(struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen,
|
||||
vp = ncp->nc_vp;
|
||||
mutex_enter(vp->v_interlock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&ncp->nc_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
error = vget(vp, LK_NOWAIT);
|
||||
if (error) {
|
||||
KASSERT(error == EBUSY);
|
||||
@ -465,9 +492,7 @@ cache_lookup(struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen,
|
||||
* This vnode is being cleaned out.
|
||||
* XXX badhits?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_falsehits);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/* found nothing */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -481,9 +506,7 @@ cache_lookup(struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen,
|
||||
#endif /* DEBUG */
|
||||
|
||||
/* We don't have the right lock, but this is only for stats. */
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_goodhits);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* found it */
|
||||
*vn_ret = vp;
|
||||
@ -512,18 +535,15 @@ cache_lookup_raw(struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cpup = curcpu()->ci_data.cpu_nch;
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
if (__predict_false(namelen > NCHNAMLEN)) {
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_long);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/* found nothing */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_enter(namecache_lock);
|
||||
ncp = cache_lookup_entry(dvp, name, namelen);
|
||||
mutex_exit(namecache_lock);
|
||||
if (__predict_false(ncp == NULL)) {
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_miss);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/* found nothing */
|
||||
@ -539,15 +559,15 @@ cache_lookup_raw(struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen,
|
||||
/*cnp->cn_flags |= ncp->nc_flags;*/
|
||||
*iswht_ret = (ncp->nc_flags & ISWHITEOUT) != 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_neghits);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&ncp->nc_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/* found negative entry; vn is already null from above */
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_enter(vp->v_interlock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&ncp->nc_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
error = vget(vp, LK_NOWAIT);
|
||||
if (error) {
|
||||
KASSERT(error == EBUSY);
|
||||
@ -555,17 +575,13 @@ cache_lookup_raw(struct vnode *dvp, const char *name, size_t namelen,
|
||||
* This vnode is being cleaned out.
|
||||
* XXX badhits?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_falsehits);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
/* found nothing */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Unlocked, but only for stats. */
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_goodhits); /* XXX can be "badhits" */
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* found it */
|
||||
*vn_ret = vp;
|
||||
@ -617,9 +633,7 @@ cache_revlookup(struct vnode *vp, struct vnode **dvpp, char **bpp, char *bufp)
|
||||
ncp->nc_name[1] == '.')
|
||||
panic("cache_revlookup: found entry for ..");
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_revhits);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
nlen = ncp->nc_nlen;
|
||||
|
||||
if (bufp) {
|
||||
@ -651,9 +665,7 @@ cache_revlookup(struct vnode *vp, struct vnode **dvpp, char **bpp, char *bufp)
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_exit(&ncp->nc_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_revmiss);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
mutex_exit(namecache_lock);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
*dvpp = NULL;
|
||||
@ -1101,9 +1113,7 @@ namecache_count_pass2(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct nchcpu *cpup = curcpu()->ci_data.cpu_nch;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_pass2);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
@ -1111,9 +1121,7 @@ namecache_count_2passes(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct nchcpu *cpup = curcpu()->ci_data.cpu_nch;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_enter(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
COUNT(cpup->cpu_stats, ncs_2passes);
|
||||
mutex_exit(&cpup->cpu_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user