1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
Internet Software Consortium
|
|
|
|
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Distribution
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
Version 3, Beta 2, Patchlevel 0
|
|
|
|
January 21, 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
README FILE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should read this file carefully before trying to install or use
|
|
|
|
the ISC DHCP Distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 WHERE TO FIND DOCUMENTATION
|
|
|
|
2 RELEASE STATUS
|
|
|
|
3 BUILDING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
3.1 UNPACKING IT
|
|
|
|
3.2 CONFIGURING IT
|
|
|
|
3.2.1 DYNAMIC DNS UPDATES
|
|
|
|
3.3 BUILDING IT
|
|
|
|
4 INSTALLING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
5 USING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
5.1 LINUX
|
|
|
|
5.1.1 IF_TR.H NOT FOUND
|
|
|
|
5.1.2 SO_ATTACH_FILTER UNDECLARED
|
|
|
|
5.1.3 PROTOCOL NOT CONFIGURED
|
|
|
|
5.1.4 BROADCAST
|
|
|
|
5.1.5 FIREWALL RULES
|
|
|
|
5.1.6 IP BOOTP AGENT
|
|
|
|
5.1.7 MULTIPLE INTERFACES
|
|
|
|
5.2 SCO
|
|
|
|
5.3 HP-UX
|
|
|
|
5.4 ULTRIX
|
|
|
|
5.5 FreeBSD
|
|
|
|
5.6 NeXTSTEP
|
|
|
|
5.7 SOLARIS
|
|
|
|
6 SUPPORT
|
|
|
|
6.1 HOW TO REPORT BUGS
|
|
|
|
7 KNOWN BUGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHERE TO FIND DOCUMENTATION
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Documentation for this software includes this README file, the
|
|
|
|
RELNOTES file, and the manual pages, which are in the server, common,
|
|
|
|
client and relay subdirectories. Internet standards relating to the
|
|
|
|
DHCP protocol are stored in the doc subdirectory. You will have the
|
|
|
|
best luck reading the manual pages if you build this software and then
|
|
|
|
install it, although you can read them directly out of the
|
|
|
|
distribution if you need to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DHCP server documentation is in the dhcpd man page. Information about
|
|
|
|
the DHCP server lease database is in the dhcpd.leases man page.
|
|
|
|
Server configuration documentation is in the dhcpd.conf man page as
|
|
|
|
well as the dhcp-options man page. A sample DHCP server
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
configuration is in the file server/dhcpd.conf. The source for the
|
|
|
|
dhcpd, dhcpd.leases and dhcpd.conf man pages is in the server/ sub-
|
|
|
|
directory in the distribution. The source for the dhcp-options.5
|
|
|
|
man page is in the common/ subdirectory.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DHCP Client documentation is in the dhclient man page. DHCP client
|
|
|
|
configuration documentation is in the dhclient.conf man page and the
|
|
|
|
dhcp-options man page. The DHCP client configuration script is
|
|
|
|
documented in the dhclient-script man page. The format of the DHCP
|
|
|
|
client lease database is documented in the dhclient.leases man page.
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
The source for all these man pages is in the client/ subdirectory in
|
|
|
|
the distribution. In addition, the dhcp-options man page should be
|
|
|
|
referred to for information about DHCP options.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
DHCP relay agent documentation is in the dhcrelay man page, the source
|
|
|
|
for which is distributed in the relay/ subdirectory.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To read installed manual pages, use the man command. Type "man page"
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
where page is the name of the manual page. This will only work if
|
|
|
|
you have installed the ISC DHCP distribution using the ``make install''
|
|
|
|
command (described later).
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to read manual pages that aren't installed, you can type
|
|
|
|
``nroff -man page |more'' where page is the filename of the
|
|
|
|
unformatted manual page. The filename of an unformatted manual page
|
|
|
|
is the name of the manual page, followed by '.', followed by some
|
|
|
|
number - 5 for documentation about files, and 8 for documentation
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
about programs. For example, to read the dhcp-options man page,
|
|
|
|
you would type ``nroff -man common/dhcp-options.5 |more'', assuming
|
|
|
|
your current working directory is the top level directory of the ISC
|
|
|
|
DHCP Distribution.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you do not have the nroff command, you can type ``more catpage''
|
|
|
|
where catpage is the filename of the catted man page. Catted man
|
|
|
|
pages names are the name of the manual page followed by ".cat"
|
|
|
|
followed by 5 or 8, as with unformatted manual pages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please note that until you install the manual pages, the pathnames of
|
|
|
|
files to which they refer will not be correct for your operating
|
|
|
|
system.
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
RELEASE STATUS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the first beta release of version 3.0 of the ISC DHCP
|
|
|
|
Distribution. Development of this release is approaching the point
|
|
|
|
at which it will be frozen, and no significant new features will be
|
|
|
|
added.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this release, the server and relay agent currently work well on
|
1999-04-09 21:55:01 +04:00
|
|
|
NetBSD, Linux after kernel version 2.0.30, FreeBSD, BSD/OS, Ultrix,
|
|
|
|
Digital Alpha OSF/1, Solaris and SunOS 4.1.4. They run on AIX, HPUX,
|
|
|
|
IRIX and Linux 2.0.30 and earlier kernels but support only a single
|
|
|
|
broadcast network interface. They also runs on QNX as long as only
|
|
|
|
one broadcast network interface is configured and a host route is
|
|
|
|
added from that interface to the 255.255.255.255 broadcast address.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The DHCP client currently only knows how to configure the network on
|
|
|
|
NetBSD, FreeBSD, BSD/os, Linux, Solaris and NextStep. The client
|
|
|
|
depends on a system-dependent shell script to do network
|
|
|
|
configuration - support for other operating systems is simply a matter
|
|
|
|
of porting this shell script to the new platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you wish to run the DHCP Distribution on Linux, please see the
|
|
|
|
Linux-specific notes later in this document. If you wish to run on an
|
|
|
|
SCO release, please see the SCO-specific notes later in this document.
|
|
|
|
You particularly need to read these notes if you intend to support
|
|
|
|
Windows 95 clients. If you are running a version of FreeBSD prior to
|
|
|
|
2.2, please read the note on FreeBSD. If you are running HP-UX or
|
|
|
|
Ultrix, please read the notes for those operating systems below.
|
|
|
|
If you are running NeXTSTEP, please see the notes on NeXTSTEP below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you start dhcpd and get a message, "no free bpf", that means you
|
|
|
|
need to configure the Berkeley Packet Filter into your operating
|
|
|
|
system kernel. On NetBSD, FreeBSD and BSD/os, type ``man bpf'' for
|
|
|
|
information. On Digital Unix, type ``man pfilt''.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILDING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
UNPACKING IT
|
|
|
|
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
To build the DHCP Distribution, unpack the compressed tar file using
|
|
|
|
the tar utility and the gzip command - type something like:
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
zcat dhcp-3.0b2pl0.tar.gz |tar xvf -
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
1999-04-09 21:55:01 +04:00
|
|
|
On BSD/OS, you have to type gzcat, not zcat, and you may run into
|
|
|
|
similar problems on other operating systems.
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
CONFIGURING IT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, cd to the dhcp-3.0b2pl0 subdirectory that you've just
|
|
|
|
created and configure the source tree by typing:
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./configure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the configure utility can figure out what sort of system you're
|
|
|
|
running on, it will create a custom Makefile for you for that
|
|
|
|
system; otherwise, it will complain. If it can't figure out what
|
|
|
|
system you are using, that system is not supported - you are on
|
|
|
|
your own.
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
DYNAMIC DNS UPDATES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An interim implementation of dynamic DNS updates is included in this
|
|
|
|
release. This implementation is not built by default. To use this
|
|
|
|
implementation, you must have installed the latest version of bind 8.2
|
|
|
|
(see http://www.isc.org for more information about BIND). The
|
|
|
|
configuration utility assumes that the BIND 8.2 distribution libraries
|
|
|
|
and includes are under the /usr/local/bind directory, except on
|
|
|
|
FreeBSD, where it assumes they are in /usr/local. If you have
|
|
|
|
installed them elsewhere, you should set the BINDLIB and BINDINC
|
|
|
|
variables in site.conf to override the values that will be set by the
|
|
|
|
configure script from Makefile.conf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming that you have BIND 8.2.2-P3 or later installed, you can build
|
|
|
|
dynamic DNS update support using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./configure --with-nsupdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is documentation for the DDNS support in the dhcpd.conf manual
|
|
|
|
page - see the beginning of this document for information on finding
|
|
|
|
manual pages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILDING IT
|
|
|
|
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
Once you've run configure, just type ``make'', and after a while
|
|
|
|
you should have a dhcp server. If you get compile errors on one
|
|
|
|
of the supported systems mentioned earlier, please let us know.
|
|
|
|
If you get warnings, it's not likely to be a problem - the DHCP
|
|
|
|
server compiles completely warning-free on as many architectures
|
|
|
|
as we can manage, but there are a few for which this is difficult.
|
|
|
|
If you get errors on a system not mentioned above, you will need
|
|
|
|
to do some programming or debugging on your own to get the DHCP
|
|
|
|
Distribution working.
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
INSTALLING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
Once you have successfully gotten the DHCP Distribution to build, you
|
|
|
|
can install it by typing ``make install''. If you already have an old
|
|
|
|
version of the DHCP Distribution installed, you may want to save it
|
|
|
|
before typing ``make install''.
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
USING THE DHCP DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
LINUX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are three big LINUX issues: the all-ones broadcast address,
|
|
|
|
Linux 2.1 ip_bootp_agent enabling, and operations with more than one
|
|
|
|
network interface. There are also two potential compilation/runtime
|
|
|
|
problems for Linux 2.1/2.2: the "SO_ATTACH_FILTER undeclared" problem
|
|
|
|
and the "protocol not configured" problem.
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
LINUX: IF_TR.H NOT FOUND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you compile the distribution on Linux, you may get an error
|
|
|
|
message indicating that the include file if_tr.h could not be found.
|
|
|
|
If this happens, go into includes/cf/linux.h and delete the line that
|
|
|
|
defined HAVE_TR_SUPPORT, or look into installing a new version of libc
|
|
|
|
that includes the if_tr.h file. We will be working on removing this
|
|
|
|
problem in the future, but for now, if you run into it, this should be
|
|
|
|
a viable workaround.
|
|
|
|
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
LINUX: SO_ATTACH_FILTER UNDECLARED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, there is a minor issue that we will mention here because
|
|
|
|
this release is so close on the heels of the Linux 2.2 release: there
|
|
|
|
is a symlink in /usr/include that points at the linux asm headers. It
|
|
|
|
appears to be not uncommon that this link won't be updated correctly,
|
|
|
|
in which case you'll get the following error when you try to build:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lpf.c: In function `if_register_receive':
|
|
|
|
lpf.c:152: `SO_ATTACH_FILTER' undeclared (first use this function)
|
|
|
|
lpf.c:152: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
|
|
|
|
lpf.c:152: for each function it appears in.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The line numbers may be different, of course. If you see this
|
|
|
|
header, your linux asm header link is probably bad, and you should
|
|
|
|
make sure it's pointing to correct linux source directory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LINUX: PROTOCOL NOT CONFIGURED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One additional Linux 2.1/2.2 issue: if you get the following message,
|
|
|
|
it's because your kernel doesn't have the linux packetfilter or raw
|
|
|
|
packet socket configured:
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
Make sure CONFIG_PACKET (Packet socket) and CONFIG_FILTER (Socket
|
|
|
|
Filtering) are enabled in your kernel configuration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If this happens, you need to configure your Linux kernel to support
|
|
|
|
Socket Filtering and the Packet socket. You can do this by typing
|
|
|
|
``make config'', ``make menuconfig'' or ``make xconfig'', and then
|
|
|
|
enabling the Packet socket and Socket Filtering options that you'll
|
|
|
|
see displayed on the menu or in the questionnaire. You can also edit
|
|
|
|
your linux kernel .config file directly: set CONFIG_FILTER=y and
|
|
|
|
CONFIG_PACKET=y. If you do this, make sure you run ``make oldconfig''
|
|
|
|
afterwards, so that the changes you've made are propogated to the
|
|
|
|
kernel header files. After you've reconfigured, you need to type
|
|
|
|
``make'' to build a new Linux kernel, and then install it in the
|
|
|
|
appropriate place (probably /linux). Make sure to save a copy of your
|
|
|
|
old /linux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the preceding paragraph made no sense to you, ask your Linux
|
|
|
|
vendor/guru for help - please don't ask us.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you set CONFIG_PACKET=m or CONFIG_FILTER=m, then you must tell the
|
|
|
|
kernel module loader to load the appropriate modules. If this doesn't
|
|
|
|
make sense to you, don't use CONFIG_whatever=m - use CONFIG_whatever=y.
|
|
|
|
Don't ask for help with this on the DHCP mailing list - it's a Linux
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
kernel issue. This is probably not a problem with the most recent
|
|
|
|
Linux 2.2.x kernels.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LINUX: BROADCAST
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
On older versions of Linux (versions prior to 2.2), there is a
|
|
|
|
potential problem with the broadcast address being sent incorrectly.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
In order for dhcpd to work correctly with picky DHCP clients (e.g.,
|
|
|
|
Windows 95), it must be able to send packets with an IP destination
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
address of 255.255.255.255. Unfortunately, Linux changes an IP
|
|
|
|
destination of 255.255.255.255 into the local subnet broadcast address
|
|
|
|
(here, that's 192.5.5.223). This isn't a problem on Linux 2.2 and
|
|
|
|
later kernels, since we completely bypass the Linux IP stack, but on
|
|
|
|
old versions of Linux 2.1 and all versions of Linux prior to 2.1, it
|
|
|
|
is a problem - pickier DHCP clients connected to the same network as
|
|
|
|
the ISC DHCP server or ISC relay agent will not see messages from the
|
|
|
|
DHCP server.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is possible to work around this problem on some versions of Linux
|
|
|
|
by creating a host route from your network interface address to
|
|
|
|
255.255.255.255. The command you need to use to do this on Linux
|
|
|
|
varies from version to version. The easiest version is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
route add -host 255.255.255.255 dev eth0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On some older Linux systems, you will get an error if you try to do
|
|
|
|
this. On those systems, try adding the following entry to your
|
|
|
|
/etc/hosts file:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255.255.255.255 all-ones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then, try:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
route add -host all-ones dev eth0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another route that has worked for some users is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
route add -net 255.255.255.0 dev eth0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are not using eth0 as your network interface, you should
|
|
|
|
specify the network interface you *are* using in your route command.
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
LINUX: FIREWALL RULES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are running the DHCP server or client on a Linux system that's
|
|
|
|
also acting as a firewall, you must be sure to allow DHCP packets
|
|
|
|
through the firewall - Linux firewalls make filtering decisions before
|
|
|
|
they make the forwarding decision, so they will filter packets that
|
|
|
|
are intended for the firewall itself, as well as packets intended to
|
|
|
|
be forwarded. In particular, your firewall rules _must_ allow
|
|
|
|
packets from IP address 0.0.0.0 to IP address 255.255.255.255 from UDP
|
|
|
|
port 68 to UDP port 67 through. They must also allow packets from
|
|
|
|
your local firewall's IP address and UDP port 67 through to any
|
|
|
|
address your DHCP server might serve on UDP port 68. Finally,
|
|
|
|
packets from relay agents on port 67 to the DHCP server on port 67,
|
|
|
|
and vice versa, must be permitted.
|
|
|
|
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
LINUX: IP BOOTP AGENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some versions of the Linux 2.1 kernel apparently prevent dhcpd from
|
|
|
|
working unless you enable it by doing the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_bootp_agent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LINUX: MULTIPLE INTERFACES
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
Very old versions of the Linux kernel do not provide a networking API
|
|
|
|
that allows dhcpd to operate correctly if the system has more than one
|
|
|
|
broadcast network interface. However, Linux 2.0 kernels with version
|
|
|
|
numbers greater than or equal to 2.0.31 add an API feature: the
|
|
|
|
SO_BINDTODEVICE socket option. If SO_BINDTODEVICE is present, it is
|
|
|
|
possible for dhcpd to operate on Linux with more than one network
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
interface. In order to take advantage of this, you must be running a
|
|
|
|
2.0.31 or greater kernel, and you must have 2.0.31 or later system
|
|
|
|
headers installed *before* you build the DHCP Distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have heard reports that you must still add routes to 255.255.255.255
|
|
|
|
in order for the all-ones broadcast to work, even on 2.0.31 kernels.
|
|
|
|
In fact, you now need to add a route for each interface. Hopefully
|
|
|
|
the Linux kernel gurus will get this straight eventually.
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
Linux 2.1 and later kernels do not use SO_BINDTODEVICE or require the
|
|
|
|
broadcast address hack, but do support multiple interfaces, using the
|
|
|
|
Linux Packet Filter.
|
|
|
|
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
SCO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCO has the same problem as Linux (described earlier). The thing is,
|
|
|
|
SCO *really* doesn't want to let you add a host route to the all-ones
|
|
|
|
broadcast address. One technique that has been successful on some
|
|
|
|
versions of SCO is the very bizarre command:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ifconfig net0 alias 10.1.1.1 netmask 8.0.0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently this works because of an interaction between SCO's support
|
|
|
|
for network classes and the weird netmask. The 10.* network is just a
|
|
|
|
dummy that can generally be assumed to be safe. Don't ask why this
|
|
|
|
works. Just try it. If it works for you, great. If not, SCO is
|
|
|
|
supposedly adding hooks to support real DHCP service in a future
|
|
|
|
release - I have this on good authority from the people at SCO who do
|
|
|
|
*their* DHCP server and client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HP-UX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HP-UX has the same problem with the all-ones broadcast address that
|
|
|
|
SCO and Linux have. One user reported that adding the following to
|
|
|
|
/etc/rc.config.d/netconf helped (you may have to modify this to suit
|
|
|
|
your local configuration):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERFACE_NAME[0]=lan0
|
|
|
|
IP_ADDRESS[0]=1.1.1.1
|
|
|
|
SUBNET_MASK[0]=255.255.255.0
|
|
|
|
BROADCAST_ADDRESS[0]="255.255.255.255"
|
|
|
|
LANCONFIG_ARGS[0]="ether"
|
|
|
|
DHCP_ENABLE[0]=0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ULTRIX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that we have Ultrix packet filter support, the DHCP Distribution
|
|
|
|
on Ultrix should be pretty trouble-free. However, one thing you do
|
|
|
|
need to be aware of is that it now requires that the pfilt device be
|
|
|
|
configured into your kernel and present in /dev. If you type ``man
|
|
|
|
packetfilter'', you will get some information on how to configure your
|
|
|
|
kernel for the packet filter (if it isn't already) and how to make an
|
|
|
|
entry for it in /dev.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FreeBSD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Versions of FreeBSD prior to 2.2 have a bug in BPF support in that the
|
|
|
|
ethernet driver swaps the ethertype field in the ethernet header
|
|
|
|
downstream from BPF, which corrupts the output packet. If you are
|
|
|
|
running a version of FreeBSD prior to 2.2, and you find that dhcpd
|
|
|
|
can't communicate with its clients, you should #define BROKEN_FREEBSD_BPF
|
|
|
|
in site.h and recompile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NeXTSTEP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The NeXTSTEP support uses the NeXTSTEP Berkeley Packet Filter
|
|
|
|
extension, which is not included in the base NextStep system. You
|
|
|
|
must install this extension in order to get dhcpd or dhclient to work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLARIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One problem which has been observed and is not fixed in this
|
|
|
|
patchlevel has to do with using DLPI on Solaris machines. The symptom
|
|
|
|
of this problem is that the DHCP server never receives any requests.
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
This has been observed with Solaris 2.6 and Solaris 7 on Intel x86
|
|
|
|
systems, although it may occur with other systems as well. If you
|
|
|
|
encounter this symptom, and you are running the DHCP server on a
|
|
|
|
machine with a single broadcast network interface, you may wish to
|
|
|
|
edit the includes/site.h file and uncomment the #define USE_SOCKETS
|
|
|
|
line. Then type ``make clean; make''.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The DHCP client on Solaris will only work with DLPI. If you run it
|
|
|
|
and it just keeps saying it's sending DHCPREQUEST packets, but never
|
|
|
|
gets a response, you may be having DLPI trouble as described above.
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
If so, we have no solution to offer at this time. Also, because
|
|
|
|
Solaris requires you to "plumb" an interface before it can be detected
|
|
|
|
by the DHCP client, you must either specify the name(s) of the
|
|
|
|
interface(s) you want to configure on the command line, or must plumb
|
|
|
|
the interfaces prior to invoking the DHCP client. This can be done
|
|
|
|
with ``ifconfig iface plumb'', where iface is the name of the
|
|
|
|
interface (e.g., ``ifconfig hme0 plumb'').
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It should be noted that Solaris versions from 2.6 onward include a
|
|
|
|
DHCP client that you can run with ``/sbin/ifconfig iface dhcp start''
|
|
|
|
rather than using the ISC DHCP client. The feature set of the Solaris
|
|
|
|
client is different (not necessarily better or worse) than that of the
|
|
|
|
ISC client, but in most cases it will be a lot easier for you to just
|
|
|
|
use that. Please do not ask for help in using the Solaris DHCP client
|
|
|
|
on Internet Software Consortium mailing lists - that's why you're
|
|
|
|
paying Sun the big bucks. If you're having a problem with the
|
|
|
|
Solaris client interoperating with the ISC dhcp server, that's another
|
|
|
|
matter, but please check with Sun first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPORT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Internet Software Consortium DHCP server is not a commercial
|
|
|
|
product, and is not supported in that sense. However, it has
|
|
|
|
attracted a fairly sizable following on the Internet, which means that
|
|
|
|
there are a lot of knowledgable users who may be able to help you if
|
|
|
|
you get stuck. These people generally read the dhcp-server@fugue.com
|
|
|
|
mailing list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are going to use dhcpd, you should probably subscribe to the
|
|
|
|
dhcp-server and dhcp-announce mailing lists. If you will be using
|
|
|
|
dhclient, you should subscribe to the dhcp-client mailing list.
|
1999-04-09 21:55:01 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you need help, you should ask on the dhcp-server or dhcp-client
|
|
|
|
mailing list (or both) - whichever is appropriate to your
|
|
|
|
application. This includes reporting bugs. Please do not report
|
|
|
|
bugs in old software releases - fetch the latest release and see if
|
|
|
|
the bug is still in that copy of the software, and if it's not, _then_
|
|
|
|
report it. It's okay to report bugs in the latest patchlevel of a
|
|
|
|
major version that's not the most recent major version, though - for
|
|
|
|
example, if you're running 2.0, you don't have to upgrade to 3.0
|
|
|
|
before you can report bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE READ THIS README FILE CAREFULLY BEFORE REPORTING BUGS!
|
|
|
|
|
2000-04-22 12:18:11 +04:00
|
|
|
HOW TO REPORT BUGS
|
|
|
|
|
1999-04-09 21:55:01 +04:00
|
|
|
When you report bugs, please provide us complete information. A list
|
|
|
|
of information we need follows. Please read it carefully, and put
|
|
|
|
all the information you can into your initial bug report, so that we
|
|
|
|
don't have to ask you any questions in order to figure out your
|
|
|
|
problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The specific operating system name and version of the
|
|
|
|
machine on which the DHCP server or client is running.
|
|
|
|
- The specific operating system name and version of the
|
|
|
|
machine on which the client is running, if you are having
|
|
|
|
trouble getting a client working with the server.
|
|
|
|
- If you're running Linux, the version number we care about is
|
|
|
|
the kernel version and maybe the library version, not the
|
|
|
|
distribution version - e.g., while we don't mind knowing
|
|
|
|
that you're running Redhat version mumble.foo, we must know
|
|
|
|
what kernel version you're running, and it helps if you can
|
|
|
|
tell us what version of the C library you're running,
|
|
|
|
although if you don't know that off the top of your head it
|
|
|
|
may be hard for you to figure it out, so don't go crazy
|
|
|
|
trying.
|
|
|
|
- The specific version of the DHCP distribution you're
|
|
|
|
running, for example 2.0b1pl19, not 2.0.
|
|
|
|
- Please explain the problem carefully, thinking through what
|
|
|
|
you're saying to ensure that you don't assume we know
|
|
|
|
something about your situation that we don't know.
|
|
|
|
- Include your dhcpd.conf and dhcpd.leases file if they're not
|
|
|
|
huge (if they are huge, we may need them anyway, but don't
|
|
|
|
send them until you're asked).
|
|
|
|
- Include a log of your server or client running until it
|
|
|
|
encounters the problem - for example, if you are having
|
|
|
|
trouble getting some client to get an address, restart the
|
|
|
|
server with the -d flag and then restart the client, and
|
|
|
|
send us what the server prints. Likewise, with the client,
|
|
|
|
include the output of the client as it fails to get an
|
|
|
|
address or otherwise does the wrong thing. Do not leave
|
|
|
|
out parts of the output that you think aren't interesting.
|
|
|
|
- If the client or server is dumping core, please run the
|
|
|
|
debugger and get a stack trace, and include that in your
|
|
|
|
bug report. For example, if your debugger is gdb, do the
|
|
|
|
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gdb dhcpd dhcpd.core
|
|
|
|
(gdb) where
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
(gdb) quit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This assumes that it's the dhcp server you're debugging, and
|
|
|
|
that the core file is in dhcpd.core.
|
|
|
|
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
PLEASE DO NOT send queries about non-isc clients to the dhcp-client
|
|
|
|
mailing list. If you're asking about them on an ISC mailing list,
|
|
|
|
it's probably because you're using the ISC DHCP server, so ask there.
|
1999-04-09 21:55:01 +04:00
|
|
|
If you are having problems with a client whose executable is called
|
|
|
|
dhcpcd, this is _not_ the ISC DHCP client, and we probably can't help
|
|
|
|
you with it.
|
1999-03-30 05:54:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please see http://www.fugue.com/dhcp/lists for details on how to
|
|
|
|
subscribe. If you don't have WorldWide Web access, you can send mail
|
|
|
|
to dhcp-request@fugue.com and tell me which lists you want to
|
|
|
|
subscribe to, but please use the web interface if you can, since I
|
|
|
|
have to handle the -request mailing list manually, and I will give you
|
|
|
|
the third degree if you make me do your subscription manually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE DO NOT SEND REQUESTS FOR SUPPORT DIRECTLY TO ME! The number of
|
|
|
|
people using the DHCP Distribution is sufficiently large that if I
|
|
|
|
take an interrupt every time any one of those people runs into
|
|
|
|
trouble, I will never get any more coding done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE DO NOT CALL ME ON THE PHONE FOR SUPPORT! Answering the phone
|
|
|
|
takes a lot more of my time and attention than answering email. If you
|
|
|
|
do call me on the phone, I will tell you to send email to the mailing
|
|
|
|
list, and I won't answer your question, so there's no point in doing
|
|
|
|
it.
|