2007-10-19 22:52:09 +04:00
|
|
|
/* $NetBSD: linux_sysctl.c,v 1.32 2007/10/19 18:52:12 njoly Exp $ */
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*-
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2003 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
|
|
|
* All rights reserved.
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
*
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
* This code is derived from software contributed to The NetBSD Foundation
|
|
|
|
* by Andrew Brown.
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
|
|
* are met:
|
|
|
|
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
|
|
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
* 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
|
|
|
|
* must display the following acknowledgement:
|
|
|
|
* This product includes software developed by the NetBSD
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, Inc. and its contributors.
|
|
|
|
* 4. Neither the name of The NetBSD Foundation nor the names of its
|
|
|
|
* contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
|
|
|
|
* from this software without specific prior written permission.
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
*
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE NETBSD FOUNDATION, INC. AND CONTRIBUTORS
|
|
|
|
* ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
|
|
|
|
* TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
|
|
|
|
* PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE FOUNDATION OR CONTRIBUTORS
|
|
|
|
* BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
|
|
|
|
* CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
|
|
|
|
* SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
|
|
|
|
* INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
|
|
|
|
* CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
|
|
|
|
* ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
|
|
|
|
* POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* sysctl system call.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
|
2007-10-19 22:52:09 +04:00
|
|
|
__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: linux_sysctl.c,v 1.32 2007/10/19 18:52:12 njoly Exp $");
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/param.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/systm.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/errno.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/proc.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/mount.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/syscallargs.h>
|
2006-09-24 02:11:59 +04:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/ktrace.h>
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <compat/linux/common/linux_types.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <compat/linux/common/linux_signal.h>
|
2007-10-19 22:52:09 +04:00
|
|
|
#include <compat/linux/common/linux_ipc.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <compat/linux/common/linux_sem.h>
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <compat/linux/linux_syscallargs.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <compat/linux/common/linux_sysctl.h>
|
2002-03-20 03:27:58 +03:00
|
|
|
#include <compat/linux/common/linux_exec.h>
|
2007-04-23 16:45:42 +04:00
|
|
|
#include <compat/linux/common/linux_machdep.h>
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
char linux_sysname[128] = "Linux";
|
2006-03-08 06:55:31 +03:00
|
|
|
#if defined(__amd64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__powerpc__)
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
char linux_release[128] = "2.4.18";
|
|
|
|
char linux_version[128] = "#0 Wed Feb 20 20:00:02 CET 2002";
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
char linux_release[128] = "2.0.38";
|
|
|
|
char linux_version[128] = "#0 Sun Nov 11 11:11:11 MET 2000";
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2004-05-20 10:34:24 +04:00
|
|
|
#ifndef _LKM
|
|
|
|
static
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
struct sysctlnode linux_sysctl_root = {
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
.sysctl_flags = SYSCTL_VERSION|
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_ROOT|CTLTYPE_NODE|CTLFLAG_READWRITE,
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
.sysctl_num = 0,
|
|
|
|
.sysctl_name = "(linux_root)",
|
2004-04-27 07:49:03 +04:00
|
|
|
sysc_init_field(_sysctl_size, sizeof(struct sysctlnode)),
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* setup for small sysctl tree used by emulation
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_SETUP(linux_sysctl_setup, "linux emulated sysctl subtree setup")
|
|
|
|
{
|
2005-06-20 06:49:18 +04:00
|
|
|
const struct sysctlnode *node = &linux_sysctl_root;
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_createv(clog, 0, &node, &node,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_PERMANENT,
|
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_NODE, "kern", NULL,
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, 0, NULL, 0,
|
|
|
|
LINUX_CTL_KERN, CTL_EOL);
|
|
|
|
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_createv(clog, 0, &node, NULL,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_PERMANENT,
|
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_STRING, "ostype", NULL,
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, 0, linux_sysname, sizeof(linux_sysname),
|
|
|
|
LINUX_KERN_OSTYPE, CTL_EOL);
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_createv(clog, 0, &node, NULL,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_PERMANENT,
|
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_STRING, "osrelease", NULL,
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, 0, linux_release, sizeof(linux_release),
|
|
|
|
LINUX_KERN_OSRELEASE, CTL_EOL);
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_createv(clog, 0, &node, NULL,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_PERMANENT,
|
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_STRING, "version", NULL,
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, 0, linux_version, sizeof(linux_version),
|
|
|
|
LINUX_KERN_VERSION, CTL_EOL);
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
linux_sysctl_root.sysctl_flags &= ~CTLFLAG_READWRITE;
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* linux sysctl system call
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
int
|
2006-11-16 04:32:37 +03:00
|
|
|
linux_sys___sysctl(struct lwp *l, void *v, register_t *retval)
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
struct linux_sys___sysctl_args *uap = v;
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
struct linux___sysctl ls;
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
int error, nerror, name[CTL_MAXNAME];
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
size_t savelen = 0, oldlen = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* get linux args structure
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if ((error = copyin(SCARG(uap, lsp), &ls, sizeof(ls))))
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
return error;
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* get oldlen
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
oldlen = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (ls.oldlenp != NULL) {
|
|
|
|
error = copyin(ls.oldlenp, &oldlen, sizeof(oldlen));
|
|
|
|
if (error)
|
|
|
|
return (error);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
savelen = oldlen;
|
|
|
|
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
* top-level sysctl names may or may not be non-terminal, but
|
|
|
|
* we don't care
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
if (ls.nlen > CTL_MAXNAME || ls.nlen < 1)
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
return (EINVAL);
|
|
|
|
error = copyin(ls.name, &name, ls.nlen * sizeof(int));
|
|
|
|
if (error)
|
|
|
|
return (error);
|
|
|
|
|
2007-08-15 16:07:23 +04:00
|
|
|
ktrmib(name, ls.nlen);
|
|
|
|
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
* wire old so that copyout() is less likely to fail?
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
error = sysctl_lock(l, ls.oldval, savelen);
|
|
|
|
if (error)
|
|
|
|
return (error);
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* dispatch request into linux sysctl tree
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
error = sysctl_dispatch(&name[0], ls.nlen,
|
|
|
|
ls.oldval, &oldlen,
|
|
|
|
ls.newval, ls.newlen,
|
|
|
|
&name[0], l, &linux_sysctl_root);
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
* release the sysctl lock
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_unlock(l);
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2002-02-20 20:02:48 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
* reset caller's oldlen, even if we got an error
|
2002-02-20 20:02:48 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
if (ls.oldlenp) {
|
|
|
|
nerror = copyout(&oldlen, ls.oldlenp, sizeof(oldlen));
|
|
|
|
if (error == 0)
|
|
|
|
error = nerror;
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2002-03-20 03:27:58 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
* if the only problem is that we weren't given enough space,
|
|
|
|
* that's an ENOMEM error
|
2002-03-20 03:27:58 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
if (error == 0 && ls.oldval != NULL && savelen < oldlen)
|
|
|
|
error = ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (error);
|
2002-03-20 03:27:58 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
/*
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
* kernel related system variables under emul.linux in the main sysctl
|
|
|
|
* tree
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
SYSCTL_SETUP(sysctl_emul_linux_setup, "sysctl emul.linux subtree setup")
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_createv(clog, 0, NULL, NULL,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_PERMANENT,
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_NODE, "emul", NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL, 0, NULL, 0,
|
|
|
|
CTL_EMUL, CTL_EOL);
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_createv(clog, 0, NULL, NULL,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_PERMANENT,
|
2004-05-25 08:29:08 +04:00
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_NODE, "linux",
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_DESCR("Linux emulation settings"),
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, 0, NULL, 0,
|
|
|
|
CTL_EMUL, EMUL_LINUX, CTL_EOL);
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_createv(clog, 0, NULL, NULL,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_PERMANENT,
|
2004-05-25 08:29:08 +04:00
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_NODE, "kern",
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_DESCR("Linux kernel emulation settings"),
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, 0, NULL, 0,
|
|
|
|
CTL_EMUL, EMUL_LINUX, EMUL_LINUX_KERN, CTL_EOL);
|
|
|
|
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_createv(clog, 0, NULL, NULL,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_PERMANENT|CTLFLAG_READWRITE,
|
2004-05-25 08:29:08 +04:00
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_STRING, "ostype",
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_DESCR("Linux operating system type"),
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, 0, linux_sysname, sizeof(linux_sysname),
|
|
|
|
CTL_EMUL, EMUL_LINUX, EMUL_LINUX_KERN,
|
|
|
|
EMUL_LINUX_KERN_OSTYPE, CTL_EOL);
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_createv(clog, 0, NULL, NULL,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_PERMANENT|CTLFLAG_READWRITE,
|
2004-05-25 08:29:08 +04:00
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_STRING, "osrelease",
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_DESCR("Linux operating system release"),
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, 0, linux_release, sizeof(linux_release),
|
|
|
|
CTL_EMUL, EMUL_LINUX, EMUL_LINUX_KERN,
|
|
|
|
EMUL_LINUX_KERN_OSRELEASE, CTL_EOL);
|
2004-03-24 18:34:46 +03:00
|
|
|
sysctl_createv(clog, 0, NULL, NULL,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_PERMANENT|CTLFLAG_READWRITE,
|
2004-05-25 08:29:08 +04:00
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_STRING, "osversion",
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_DESCR("Linux operating system revision"),
|
Dynamic sysctl.
Gone are the old kern_sysctl(), cpu_sysctl(), hw_sysctl(),
vfs_sysctl(), etc, routines, along with sysctl_int() et al. Now all
nodes are registered with the tree, and nodes can be added (or
removed) easily, and I/O to and from the tree is handled generically.
Since the nodes are registered with the tree, the mapping from name to
number (and back again) can now be discovered, instead of having to be
hard coded. Adding new nodes to the tree is likewise much simpler --
the new infrastructure handles almost all the work for simple types,
and just about anything else can be done with a small helper function.
All existing nodes are where they were before (numerically speaking),
so all existing consumers of sysctl information should notice no
difference.
PS - I'm sorry, but there's a distinct lack of documentation at the
moment. I'm working on sysctl(3/8/9) right now, and I promise to
watch out for buses.
2003-12-04 22:38:21 +03:00
|
|
|
NULL, 0, linux_version, sizeof(linux_version),
|
|
|
|
CTL_EMUL, EMUL_LINUX, EMUL_LINUX_KERN,
|
|
|
|
EMUL_LINUX_KERN_VERSION, CTL_EOL);
|
2002-02-15 23:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|