Aren
/
NetBSD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
NetBSD/usr.sbin/dhcpd/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-dns-01.txt

357 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

ISC dhcpd beta 5.13.
1996-10-03 10:33:24 +04:00
Network Working Group Yakov Rekhter
Internet Draft Cisco Systems
Expiration Date: January 1997 July 1996
Interaction between DHCP and DNS
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-dns-01.txt
1. Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as ``work in progress.''
To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
``1id-abstracts.txt'' listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), nic.nordu.net (Europe),
munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ds.internic.net (US East Coast), or
ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast).
2. Abstract
DHCP provides a powerful mechanism for IP host autoconfiguration.
However, the autoconfiguration provided by DHCP does not include
updating DNS, and specifically updating the name to address and
address to name mappings maintained by DNS.
This document specifies how DHCP clients and servers should use the
Dynamic DNS Updates mechanism to update the DNS name to address and
address to name mapping, so that the mappings for DHCP clients would
be consistent with the IP addresses that the clients acquire via
DHCP.
Yakov Rekhter [Page 1]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-dns-01.txt July 1996
3. Interaction between DHCP and DNS
DNS [RFC1034, RFC1035] maintains (among other things) the information
about mapping between hosts' Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDNs)
[RFC1594] and IP addresses assigned to the hosts. The information is
maintained in two types of Resource Records (RRs): A and PTR. The A
RR contains mapping from a FQDN to an IP address; the PTR RR contains
mapping from an IP address to a FQDN.
DHCP [RFC1541] provides a mechanism by which a host (a DHCP client)
could acquire certain configuration information, and specifically its
IP address(es). However, DHCP does not provide any mechanisms to
update the DNS RRs that contain the information about mapping between
the host's FQDN and its IP address(es) (A and PTR RRs). Thus the
information maintained by DNS for a DHCP client may be incorrect - a
host (the client) could acquire its address by using DHCP, but the A
RR for the host's FQDN wouldn't reflect the address that the host
acquired, and the PTR RR for the acquired address wouldn't reflect
the host's FQDN.
Dynamic DNS Updates [DynDNS] is a mechanism that enables DNS
information to be updated DNS over a network.
The Dynamic DNS Update protocol can be used to maintain consistency
between the information stored in the A and PTR RRs and the actual
address assignment done via DHCP. When a host with a particular FQDN
acquires its IP address via DHCP, the A RR associated with the host's
FQDN would be updated (by using the Dynamic DNS Updates protocol) to
reflect the new address. Likewise, when an IP address gets assigned
to a host with a particular FQDN, the PTR RR associated with this
address would be updated (using the Dynamic DNS Updates protocol) to
reflect the new FQDN.
4. Models of operations
When a DHCP client acquires a new address, both the A RR (for the
client's FQDN) and the PTR RR (for the acquired address) have to be
updated. Therefore, we have two separate Dynamic DNS Update
transactions. Acquiring an address via DHCP involves two entities: a
DHCP client and a DHCP server. In principle each of these entities
could perform none, one, or both of the transactions. However, upon
some introspection one could realize that not all permutations make
sense. This document covers the possible design permutations:
(1) DHCP client updates the A RR, DHCP server updates the PTR
RR
Yakov Rekhter [Page 2]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-dns-01.txt July 1996
(2) DHCP server updates both the A and the PTR RRs
One could observe that the only difference between these two cases is
whether the FQDN to IP address mapping is updated by a DHCP client or
by a DHCP server. The IP address to FQDN mapping is updated by a DHCP
server in both cases.
4.1. Client FQDN Option
To update the IP address to FQDN mapping a DHCP server needs to know
FQDN of the client to which the server leases the address. To allow
the client to convey its FQDN to the server this document defines a
new option, called "Client FQDN".
The code for this option is TBD. Its minimum length is 2.
Code Len Flags RCODE1 RCODE2 Domain Name
+------+------+------+------+------+------+--
| TBD | n | 0/1 | | | ...
+------+------+------+------+------+------+--
The Flags field allows a DHCP client to indicate to a DHCP server
whether the client wants the server to be responsible for updating
the FQDN to IP address mapping (if Flags is set to 1), or whether the
client wants to take this responsibility (if Flags is set to 0).
The RCODE1 and RCODE2 fields are used by a DHCP server to indicate to
a DHCP client the Response Code from Dynamic DNS Updates.
The Domain Name part of the option carries FQDN of a client.
4.2. DHCP Client behavior
If a client wants to be responsible for updating the FQDN to IP
address mapping for the FQDN and address(es) used by the client, then
the client shall include the Client FQDN option in the DHCPREQUEST
message originated by the client. The Flags field in the option shall
be set to 0. Once the client's DHCP configuration is completed (the
client receives a DHCPACK message, and successfully completed a final
check on the parameters passed in the message), the client shall
originate an update for the A RR (associated with the client's FQDN).
Yakov Rekhter [Page 3]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-dns-01.txt July 1996
The update shall be originated following the procedures described in
[DynDNS].
If a client does not want to be responsible for updating the FQDN to
IP address mapping for the FQDN and address(es) used by the client,
then the client shall include the Client FQDN option in the
DHCPREQUEST message originated by the client. The Flags field in the
option shall be set to 1.
Whether the client wants to be responsible for updating the FQDN to
IP address mapping, or whether the client wants to delegate this
responsibility to a server is a local to the client matter. The
choice between the two alternatives may be based on a particular
security model that is used with the Dynamic DNS Update protocol
(e.g., only a client may have sufficient credentials to perform
updates to the FQDN to IP address mapping for its FQDN).
If a client releases its address lease prior to the lease expiration
time, and the client is responsible for updating its A RR(s), the
client should delete the A RR (following the procedures described in
[DynDNS]) associated with the leased address before sending DHCP
RELEASE message.
4.3. DHCP Server behavior
When a server receives a DHCPREQUEST message from a client, if the
message contains the Client FQDN option, and the server replies to
the message with a DHCPACK message, the server shall originate an
update for the PTR RR (associated with the address leased to the
client). The server shall originate the update before the server
sends the DHCPACK message to the client. The update shall be
originated following the procedures described in [DynDNS]. The RCODE
from the update [DynDNS] should be carried to the client in the
RCODE1 field of the Client FQDN option in the DHCPACK message. The
RCODE2 field should be set to 0.
In addition, if the Client FQDN option carried in the DHCPREQUEST
message has its Flags field set to 1, then the server shall originate
an update for the A RR (associated with the FQDN carried in the
option). The server shall originate the update before the server
sends the DHCPACK message to the client. The update shall be
originated following the procedures described in [DynDNS]. The RCODE
from the update [DynDNS] should be carried to the client in the
RCODE2 field of the Client FQDN option in the DHCPACK message.
Yakov Rekhter [Page 4]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-dns-01.txt July 1996
When a server receives a DHCPREQUEST message from a client, and the
message contains the Client FQDN option, the server shall ignore the
value carried in the RCODE field of the option.
If a server originates updates for both the A and PTR RRs, then the
order in which the updates are generated is not significant.
If a server detects that a lease on an address that the server leases
to a client expires, the server should delete the PTR RR associated
with the address. In addition, if the client authorized the server to
update its A RR, the server should also delete the A RR. The deletion
should follow the procedures described in [DynDNS].
If a server terminates a lease on an address prior to the lease
expiration time, the server should delete the PTR RR associated with
the address. In addition, if the client (that leased the address)
authorized the server to update its A RR, the server should also
delete the A RR. The deletion should follow the procedures described
in [DynDNS].
5. Updating other RRs
The procedures described in this document cover updates only to the A
and PTR RRs. Updating other types of RRs is outside the scope of this
document.
6. Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this document.
7. References
[RFC1034] P. Mockapetris, "Domain names - concepts and facilities",
RFC1034, 11/01/1987
[RFC1035] P. Mockapetris, "Domain names - implementation and
specification", RFC1035, 11/01/1987
[RFC1541] R. Droms, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC1541,
10/27/1993
[RFC1594] A. Marine, J. Reynolds, G. Malkin, "FYI on Questions and
Yakov Rekhter [Page 5]
Internet Draft draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-dns-01.txt July 1996
Answer Answers to Commonly asked ``New Internet User'' Questions",
RFC1594, 03/11/1994
[DynDNS] P. Vixie, S. Thomson, Y. Rekhter, J. Bound, "Dynamic Updates
in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE)", draft-ietf-dnsind-dynDNS-
09.txt
8. Acknowledgements
Many thanks to Mark Beyer (Tandem), Jim Bound (DEC), Ralph Droms
(Bucknell University), Edie Gunter (IBM), Michael Lewis (Chevron),
and Michael Patton (BBN) for their review and comments.
9. Author Information
Yakov Rekhter
cisco Systems, Inc.
170 Tasman Dr.
San Jose, CA 95134
Phone: (914) 528-0090
email: yakov@cisco.com
Yakov Rekhter [Page 6]