Aren
/
NetBSD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
NetBSD/sys/Makefile

20 lines
486 B
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

Build kernel modules the same time as the rest of the system libraries.
2008-12-31 01:18:11 +03:00
# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.75 2008/12/30 22:18:11 pooka Exp $
install sys headers from sys/Makefile.
1996-09-30 03:29:16 +04:00
don't descend to crypto.
2006-10-29 22:08:53 +03:00
SUBDIR= altq arch compat dev fs miscfs \
Don't descend into netns and netccitt
2006-08-25 21:40:21 +04:00
net net80211 netatalk netbt netipsec netinet netinet6 \
netisdn netiso netkey netnatm netsmb \
Install rump libraries and utilities to the base system and remove the private non-installed build infrastructure from sys/rump. breakdown of commit: * install relevant headers into /usr/include/rump * build sys/rump/librump/rumpuser and sys/rump/librump/rumpkern from src/lib and install as librumpuser and librump, respectively + this retains the ability to test a librump build with just the kernel sources at hand * move sys/rump/fs/lib/libukfs and sys/rump/fs/lib/libp2k to src/lib for general consumption, they are not kernel-space dwellers anyway * build and install sys/rump/fs/lib/lib$fs as librumpfs_$fs * add chapter 3 manual pages for rump, rumpuser, ukfs and p2k * build and install userspace kernel file system daemons if MKPUFFS=yes is spexified * retire fsconsole for now, it will make a comeback with an actually implemented version shortly
2008-07-29 17:17:40 +04:00
nfs opencrypto sys ufs uvm
do the right thing, so things aren't built in /usr/src/sys
1993-07-04 18:02:53 +04:00
add a comment stating why evbppc doesn't do lkm or modules
2008-07-28 18:09:55 +04:00
# interrupt implementation depends on the kernel within the port
Do not try to build LKMs on evbppc, because we cannot predetermine the PPC_INTR_IMPL, which is used to include a file in <machine/intr.h>. To allow evbppc to complete a ``make release'', we also need to factor out the LKM files to a new set list file, and tweak makeflist to not include this file for evbppc. Discussed with Matt Thomas.
2003-03-16 01:32:07 +03:00
.if (${MACHINE} != "evbppc")
Build kernel modules the same time as the rest of the system libraries.
2008-12-31 01:18:11 +03:00
.if make(obj) || make(cleandir)
Remove LKMs and switch to the module framework, pass 1. Proposed on tech-kern@.
2008-11-12 15:35:50 +03:00
SUBDIR+=modules
Do not try to build LKMs on evbppc, because we cannot predetermine the PPC_INTR_IMPL, which is used to include a file in <machine/intr.h>. To allow evbppc to complete a ``make release'', we also need to factor out the LKM files to a new set list file, and tweak makeflist to not include this file for evbppc. Discussed with Matt Thomas.
2003-03-16 01:32:07 +03:00
.endif
Build kernel modules the same time as the rest of the system libraries.
2008-12-31 01:18:11 +03:00
.endif
Skip the "includes" phase of src/sys/lkm.
2001-09-22 00:53:36 +04:00
Descend into include/rump and install headers.
2008-11-17 11:54:39 +03:00
.if make(includes) || make(obj) || make(cleandir)
be sure to decend into sys/rump during "make obj". fixes builds on r/o src.
2008-07-31 05:11:53 +04:00
SUBDIR+= rump
.endif
Rework the way kernel include files are installed. In the new method, as with user-land programs, include files are installed by each directory in the tree that has includes to install. (This allows more flexibility as to what gets installed, makes 'partial installs' easier, and gives us more options as to which machines' includes get installed at any given time.) The old SYS_INCLUDES={symlinks,copies} behaviours are _both_ still supported, though at least one bug in the 'symlinks' case is fixed by this change. Include files can't be build before installation, so directories that have includes as targets (e.g. dev/pci) have to move those targets into a different Makefile.
1998-06-13 03:22:30 +04:00
.include <bsd.kinc.mk>